this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
173 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

85136 readers
4111 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
173
CO₂ scrubbing microbes discovered in underground laboratory (phys.org)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I posted this in the science community but I think it could be relevant here too. If its not or I shouldn't have posted it twice let me know and I'll remove it! Curious to hear more opinions.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Researchers are combining the best attributes from each microbe to engineer enzymes that can convert CO2 from coal-fired power plant emissions into calcium carbonate—a mineral that can later be sold as a concrete additive or for other industrial purposes.

Gotta be honest, that's pretty slick. Making concrete is one of the biggest culprits when it comes to adding CO2 to the atmosphere. Concrete has a very high carbon footprint. If we can find a way to make concrete carbon neutral, or even carbon negative... That would be truly transformative.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Unfortunately using calcium carbonate (CaCO3) from this process to make calcium oxide (CaO) for concrete would release whatever carbon dioxide (CO2) you sequestered in the process.

As you can see, to get CaO from CaCO3 you have to remove a C and two O's. or properly put, a CO2. Doing this would actually release more CO2 than you sequestered originally because to get that CaO you'd have to heat up the calcium carbonate to a few thousand degrees again, burning more coal or whatever to create the heat.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You mean like algae?

[–] MrQuallzin@pie.eyeofthestorm.place 32 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Nope! These microbes eat CO2 and poop rocks. Algae like other plants take in CO2 but I believe it gets released back into the environment after the plant dies. Bring stored in a rock is a pretty big difference

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

But what about when the rock dies?

[–] MrQuallzin@pie.eyeofthestorm.place 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We make more rocks and bury the dead rocks in the new rocks

[–] Masamune@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

The great circle of life.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Rock will never die. 🤘

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 10 points 4 days ago

algae releases oxygen, but then consumes the oxygen again latter when the energy is needed. There is just a surplus that isn't consumes - everything that makes up the cell isn't recombined, also oils and such may result as well. Sometimes this surplus rots/burns thus converting back to CO2, but other things can happen (sink to the bottom of the sea where there isn't spare oxygen to recombine with). Not all recombining is perfect either, sometimes you get coal as a result. The vast majority is recombined, but there is a lot of algae and so just a little bit of difference makes for a massive amount that isn't. (not near enough to make up for all the fuel humans are burning - but overall the earth seems to have been slightly net negative in CO2 before humans started burning fossil fuels for energy)

[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago

Interesting, I had no idea.

[–] thoralf@discuss.familie-will.at 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Sounds a little too good to be true.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah I hear ya, I'm trying to be optimistic.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

even if it is, the polluting wont stop, or emissions from our industries.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Paywall.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Weird, I'm able to view it without paying anything.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Thats wild I haven't had that pop up and I've looked at several articles there today. Sorry!

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fuck me in particular, I guess.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Save this site, it can display archived versions of paywalled articles

https://www.removepaywall.com/

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago

Or OP could post archived links.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

are you using a content blocker? ublock etc

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

that's your real problem. why, though?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lazy

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

but it's like just 3 clicks

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

I tried clicking three times, nothing happened

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most pay walls can be deleted with archive.md

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You should tell OP to post links using that

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It got banned on much of lemmy cos apparently it was acting as a Russian ddos tool

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Then maybe we shouldn't use that

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 0 points 3 days ago

Its fine imo but don't use it if ya don't want to