this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
40 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21705 readers
1390 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rozodru@piefed.world 4 points 27 minutes ago

so she knew the store policy, decided to ignore it, has known this person has taken food in the past but doesn't call the police and have them trespass, and for some reason thinks she owes the company what? something? to tackle a person taking food?

no sympathy here. who cares if someone takes food? does anyone who work retail honestly get paid enough to care? and if you do care then there's something painfully wrong with you. I worked retail some 20+ years ago and even then I didn't give a flying fuck if someone took something from where ever I was working. I wasn't be paid enough to care I barely made more than minimum wage. the only people who cared were managers and LP cause they were paid enough to care.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 minutes ago

Good, fuck em for snitching

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 43 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

FWIW, no one should feel the need to put their safety on the line for the benefit of their corporate overlords, for a number of reasons.

  1. The obvious point of you potentially getting hurt. The company doesn't want that because they could get sued. So they tell you not to intervene to cover their ass.

  2. The chance of the other person getting hurt. The company doesn't want that because they could get sued. And they'll blame it on you because you were told not to intervene.

  3. The possibility that you are simply wrong. You think you saw someone shoplift, but what if they didn't? You just assaulted a random person.

  4. Basic fucking human decency. If someone is stealing food of all things, why would you feel the need to intervene? It's not your loss, it's the company's. If the company wants to do something about it, they can figure that part out themselves.

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 17 points 2 hours ago

Yup, intervene if the person is attempting to seriously injure or kill another person and you feel motivated to intervene.

Outside of that, the company has a certain amount of loss that is built into their operating budget every year. This person has just taken advantage of that. It's not your fucking responsibility.

[–] Spes@lemmy.world 3 points 44 minutes ago

It sounds like she gave a poor rashernale.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 32 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If you see someone stealing food... No you didnt. Move on.

[–] ProIsh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

Sure but also. If you see someone stealing, no you didn't.

GOOD

Fuck that former employee

You aren't being stolen from, a company is.

You aren't losing money, the company is

You don't gain anything by interfering, the company does

You don't get rewarded, you have rewarded the company (assuming you stop the theft)

YOU DON'T MAKE ENOUGH MONEY TO CARE ABOUT SHOPLIFTERS

I don't care how much you make. You don't make enough.

If you, as someone with a lower quality of life (relative to the rich) than a medieval peasant and who definitely doesn't have the money to take care of potential medical bills thy arise from a potential altercation.

I cannot fathom caring so much about a company's profits that I intervene in any shoplifting.

Note: when I worked for a sporting goods retailer, the ONLY thing I ever did was inform a manager when I believe someone was stealing ammo for a gun. Never gave a shit about clothing, food, or even sports equipment, but in my opinion there's very few reasons to steal firearm ammunition, almost none of them involve a needy person who will use them for benefit.

If you see someone shoplifting, especially from a company, no you fucking didn't

[–] Masamune@piefed.social 5 points 1 hour ago

An employee who takes their bacon seriously is exactly the type of employee I would want hire.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Never ever do anything to stop shoplifters or robbers.

  1. Because they could be brandishing a deadly weapon
  2. You aren't paid enough to stop them, let alone intervene in any way
  3. If you were paid enough to stop them, you're paid more than enough to let them get away and not feel any pain from it.
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, yeah, she shouldn't have done it. But, it was wrong to fire her over it. I agree with the union rep, a warning would have been enough.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

Sacks for everyone! I feel like the title is trying to be witty. The caffeine hasn't kicked in yet... so I'll quietly hope someone can bag a better title for us.

Fun aside: as someone already observed - its not worth chasing down someone for retail theft. Theres insurance, shrink is factored into running costs, and you could get hurt or sued... or both. Also, while it sucks to look at it this way... if someone is stealing food... they probably needed it.