this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
22 points (92.3% liked)

Linux

65872 readers
708 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I got tired of LMDE and am a longtime lover of XFCE (though haven’t used it in years) and I gotta say this is a distro that feels like a distinct distro for once. Comes with an amazing set of tools__ the way OpenSUSE does, especially the GUI package manager and the ability to make a bootable live ISO of your running system. Definitely not your normal Debian derivative IMO. Definitely a distro I slept on for a long time. Choice of init system too is chefs kiss for all the systemD haters. The antiX foundation is nice too as I agree on their values 100%, but that distro is too minimal for my needs.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hellequin67@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

Been using it for a while, first with XFCE and just recently rebuilt with Plasma.

Hopped a lot before arriving at MX, stayed because it just works, does everything I need and more without issues.

[–] HairyHarry@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I have an elderly Lenovo Yoga running it as my daily driver. Boots fast and gets everything done what I need.

[–] PetteriPano@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I'm surprised to see comments of people actually using it. I know it's been topping distrowatch forever by inflation numbers.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I used MX for a handful of years after CrunchBang ceased development. I decided to migrate to just a core Debian install at a certain point, when I realized I was basically installing custom everything, and wasn't really using MX the way it was probably intended.

It's a good, mid-weight choice. Nothing negative to say about it.

[–] marlowe221@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, same here. I went to MX after starting with Ubuntu. Now I’m a Debian guy.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 hours ago

I left for Void at the beginning of the year, and it knocked my socks off.

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago

MX is my distro of choice.

For most common tasks, I can easily pop open either a command line or a GUI, depending on my mood.

It's like the REM of Linux distros: it can appeal to all different kinds of users, and of all different skill levels. Plus, it's not a resource hog.

I have one antiX laptop - an old Chromebook with limited storage and low power. My gaming PC in the living room runs Bazzite. And I test plenty of other distros.

But for my general purpose computers, I keep going back to MX with either Plasma or XFCE.

Plus, I love hitting F4 for the drop-down console.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 1 points 4 hours ago

Have been using it enthusiastically for a good while now. It’s got a nice balance between useable out of the box and having all the tweak ability.

Can’t recommend it enough.