Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54669 readers

572 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com

dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com

qbittorrent-nox = Firewalled / qbittorrent = Online (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 8 months ago by minimalfootprint@discuss.tchncs.de to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hello sailors,

I wanted to try out Arr* and installed and configured everything for the first few days (Native, Arch). Just tinkering around.

Radarr and Sonarr used qbittorrent at first, but the permissions gave me trouble. I installed qbittorrent-nox and run it via systemd for a different user. This fixed my permission troubles.

However, even though both run with the same settings, nox is firewalled (DHT: 0 nodes, stuck on getting the metadata) while the regular version shows online and downloads with good speeds.

I use MullvadVPN (doesn't offer Port Forwarding anymore). I opened a port in my router.

I'm pretty new to this. Does anyone have any idea what could be the problem? Do I have to add something to the systemd service?

Any hints wouldbe appreciated! Thanks for reading!

systemd service:

[Unit]
Description=qBittorrent-nox service
Documentation=man:qbittorrent-nox(1)
Wants=network-online.target
After=network-online.target nss-lookup.target

[Service]
Type=exec
User=qbittorrent-nox
group=arr
ExecStart=/usr/bin/qbittorrent-nox -webui-port=8080

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] linuxguy@lemmy.gregw.us 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't opening a port on your router defeat the purpose of the VPN?

[–] minimalfootprint@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I was getting desperate 😆

[–] droolio@feddit.uk 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If qBittorrent/qb-nox is bound to your VPN interface, then 1) your VPN needs to support port forwarding, and 2) forwarding a port on your router is pointless and unnecessary. Your only way around it is to switch VPN or don't use VPN and then port forward.

[–] minimalfootprint@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago

I'm looking into Proton, Windscribe and AirVPN atm. Travelling the high seas is my main reason for a VPN. In the past I didn't use it enough to switch from Mullvad, which I liked except for their port forwarding switch.

Thanks for the hint.

[–] Hackerpunk1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago

Use DDNS for WebUI. Disable Port-Forwarding on Router Enable Encryption in qBittorent

If I think of anything else I shall update

[–] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago

Are they attempting to listen on the same port, so one of them is failing to? Try setting a different port number for the two

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 8 months ago

Are you split tunneling?