this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
37 points (97.4% liked)

Games

16785 readers
850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 26 points 8 months ago

Ah, the age old “welp, the only people that stuck with us through all the bullshit clearly have zero standards or expectations, no point in improving anything”

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Not to worry, Blizzard had already announced they were cancelled before Microsoft acquired ActiBlizz.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m surprised they expect a dead game to continue to get treated like a live service.

[–] Hazmatastic@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This isn't just content people want and Blizz doesn't want to give because it wouldn't be profitable, it's an entire half of the game that was advertised since announcement. A lot of people got the game with the assumption it was coming. It wouldn't be "live service" if they'd included it from day one like they promised. It would only get looped into that because the "new content" should have been in there from the start. It's Blizz reaping the benefits of an empty promise but wanting none of the blame when people call them out.

[–] Echo5@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Channeling TotalBiscuit (RIP):

“STOP PREORDERING VIDEO GAMES!!!”

[–] Hazmatastic@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely, but even after release fans got told it was coming. I checked out of OW after the PvE debacle in OW1 so this doesn't surprise me, but a lot of people still thought Blizz was going to hold up their end of the bargain, even if it was a little late. So they got it just to play PvP until it came out which, as we can see, it probably never will.

[–] good_girl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/aNH6y_OiHCg?si=xIBjFiGIHwe2nYuu

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

A lot of people got the game with the assumption it was coming.

Do you mean they bought Overwatch 1, with the anticipation that at some point after the release of Overwatch 2, they would add PvE? Because Overwatch 2 was free to play from the start. The only thing that you could "pre-order" was a pack that gave some cosemtics, some premium currency, and the first battlepass. At that point PvE was something they were still planning to add at some point but still had no date, so you could only use those bonuses for the PvP.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago