AlexanderTheDead

joined 4 months ago
[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

lol mad at video game

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The commenter they were responding to literally mentioned the FDA. The US Federal Drug and Safety Administration.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'd have to see the mapeditor and confirm it's any good to care. We've had pretty capable (gen 3) map editing tools for years already. Considering what existing romhacking tools are already out there, I'm pretty skeptical that this will provide anything of value.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you think we're debating you? We're mocking you.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You seem pretty obviously upset.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

REMINDER: THIS IS WHERE WE STARTED

MY POINT = PROVEN CORRECT

PLEASE KEEP MOVING THE GOALPOST

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The paper wasn't retracted until 2010 lol. The point is that fraudulent papers can be published.

Still lmao.

This just shows the resilience of publishing, and the scientific community to fraud and [alleged] corruption

Uh... sure it does, buddy.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Tell me more about how antivax scientists didn't successfully publish a paper with tons of biases and nonsensical findings.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (7 children)

No paper would be published if it was biased and as selective as you say.

That is incredibly naive of you and truly points to your lack of credibility.

view more: next ›