Anahkiasen

I agree and that's sad but that's also how I've seen people use AI, as a search engine, as Wikipedia, as a news anchor. And in any of these three situations I feel these kind of "both sides" strictly surface facts answers do more harm than good. Maybe ChatGPT is more subtle but it breaks my heart seeing people running to DeepSeek when the vision of the world it explains to you is so obviously excised from so many realities. Some people need some morals and actual "human" answers hammered into them because they lack the empathy to do so themselves unfortunately.

I mean that's the kind of answer DeepSeek gives you if you ask it about Uyghurs. "Some say it's a genocide but they don't so guess we'll never know ¯_(ツ)_/¯", it acts as if there's a complete 50/50 split on the issue which is not the case.

Pauvre Bolloré où est-ce qu'il va propager ses idées maintenant :( Plus vraiment aucun endroit. Aucun du tout

I mean if you liked the game and enjoyed the developper's work I feel like that's worth paying them a coffee unless you truly hated it 😅

Overall good article with some inaccuracies but the answer to the articles question is to me an easy no. The whole industry won't recover because its an industry. It follows the rules of capitalism and its a constant race to the worse and while good games by good people happen on the side, they happen in spite of the system. Everything else is working as expected and will continue until you pay per minute to stream games you rent with intermittent forced ads and paid level unlocks.

| Clear Theme | +1 | |

|

| | Most Original | +1 | | Total | 2 points |

Interesting different interpretation of Peace as peace during a time of war, you get +1 originality point for it. Also reminded me of this: