Neat site!
AnarchistArtificer
joined 1 year ago
You've got to be careful with rolling your eyes, because the parallelism of the two eyes means that the eye roll can be twice as powerful ^1
(1) If measured against the silly baseline of a single eyeroll
I read this article a few months ago that I found quite interesting: Original link Unpaywalled link
The manufacturer in this blames the DEA, and whilst I don't trust a pharmaceutical company to do anything other than ruthlessly maximise profits, in this case I'm inclined to believe this depiction of the DEA as the overly persnickety bad guy (because I have even less reason to trust the DEA)
You might enjoy Freya Holmér's videos - I mostly know her for her excellent mathsy video essays, but she has loads of videos about "maths for game Devs" that might be useful.
I wonder what would facilitate people to make their own solutions in this way. Like, I have made a few apps or automation things myself, but if I look at my "normie" friends who don't have the level of tech familiarity that I do, they struggle with whatever out of the box solutions they can find. Poor IT education is a big part of this, and I've been wondering a lot about what would need to change for the average "normie" to be empowered to tinker
Fuckin' savage.
That's a hilarious reply, and I can't think of a witty response to match it
Yeah, I'm super salty about the hype because if I had to pick one side or the other, I'd be on team "AI is worthless", but that's just because I'd rather try convincing a bunch of skeptics that when used wisely, AI/ML can be super useful, than to try talk some sense into the AI fanatics. It's a shame though, because I feel like the longer the bubble takes to pop, the more harm actual AI research will receive
Eh, it depends on what we count as "AI". I'm in a field where machine learning has been a thing for years, and there's been a huge amount of progress in the last couple of years[1]. However, it's exhausting that so much is being rebranded as "AI", because the people holding the purse strings aren't necessarily the same scientists who are sick of the hype.
[1] I didn't get into the more computational side of things until 2021 or so, but if I had to point to a catalyst for this progress, I'd say that the transformer mechanism outlined in the 2017 paper "Attention is all you need", by Google scientists.
Due to skim reading, I didn't see where it said "vagina exploded because of clandestine dildo usage", and seeing the phrase in your comment made me reread OP incredulously. Yeah no, I agree with you
I mean, racism has as much reason to exist now as it ever did. "I'll protect me and what's mine" has been the dividing line between species for thousands of years, and we have to choose whether we'll continue it. A "Kill or be killed" mindset might keep you safe, but you'll never know if the person you killed did indeed mean you harm, or if you could've instead lived without killing, and broke bread with a rival. The logic still applies
Of course it was. It's always fucking Reagan (or Thatcher)