Anyolduser

joined 2 years ago
[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Ok, so that explains keeping the original comment up.

That's not what baffles me. You knew you were wrong, I called you out, and then you tried to justify it to me despite knowing you were wrong.

Why would you do that? You defended a statement you knew was wrong. Why would you defend a position you didn't believe in?

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

I've noticed that when confronted regarding an error or mistake people on Lemmy double down about half the time.

Why? Why not just stay silent? Why not edit your comment? Why not admit you made a boo-boo? Why not delete your comment? Why not just ignore my comment and pretend nobody ever called you out?

All these choices and you went with doubling down. Makes no sense whatsoever.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 11 months ago (8 children)

"Soulframe, the new free-to-play multiplayer fantasy RPG in development at Digital Extremes..." (emphasis mine).

I get that there's knock-on monetization, but - come on - it's literally the first sentence of the article.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Because Californians love writing laws as a knee jerk reaction to the crime de jour.

Some pearl-clutching local will go to their state legislature and demand that WiFi jamming be banned despite the fact that the FCC is all over that shit. They keep passing redundant gun control laws in the same way for the same reasons.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 58 points 11 months ago (3 children)

What's all the fuss about? Who hasn't butt-chugged a pitcher of margaritas at a Mexican restaurant?

Nobody else? Just me and the lady in the article?

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing it's the department of redundancy department, is my guess.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 67 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And that slut's name?

Albert Einstein.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago

Based on her recent testimony, it's believable. According to her they met at a business conference and she sought him out to pitch an idea. It doesn't seem like he went out of his way to seek her out or contact her out of the blue.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago

No, no. I'm referring specifically to you.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nobody likes a propagandist.

Less so when it's low effort.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, the guy's team was writing "articles and blog posts promoting a tech company".

Letting an LLM mangle that isn't exactly a huge loss.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago

So do you intend to do anything about it? Like maybe take down the post?

view more: ‹ prev next ›