Appoxo

joined 1 year ago
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Even the Internet Archive is slowly eroding from the bottom :(

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago

And disabling it fucks with Windows AD.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

Tell me you didnt take a look at your windows update settings without saying so.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

Just today I noticed that my Google Home (I believe gen 2) has a new voice.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Are they even saved by default in an MS account? Because if I'd link one, I would expect them to at least prompt me

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 months ago
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But now you need to run 2 pcs instead of just one.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago

As Kevnyon@lemmy.world said: @NetworkOperator: Kiss my ass. I pay your for service. You wanna restrict me, I switch my damn plan. If I use it on my phone streaming 4K stuff from my home server or watch 1GB of data over hot spot on my phone is not their business.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Are you ignoring what I wrote earlier in the same thread?

Probably only on a targeted attack. I don't see it being a mass target attack like a worm could be. And in the realm of businesses, how many programs are running in kernel level besides the antivirus/ED(P)R solution?

Anyway. Counter question: Why do you think gamers appear as a more valuable target with the anti cheat as a possible attack vector vs a business running literally the same CPU line-up but with fewer kernel level programs?

My personal opinion: You can't extract as much money from private folks vs a business through blackmail and other solutions. Not in a wide casted attack.
Targeted individuals can be assumed to be at a higher risk (e.g. hacking their private devices like the gaming pc and then doing home office work in the same network, or misusing trust in the home network between pc and phone and then installing malware like pegasus).
But again: Not in a wide casted net. And you are probably better of using the good exploits for higher value targets.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And at best reroute the traffic before going outside

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Again: Mass spread vs target attack.
Remember WannaCry? Yeah, I don't see that happen.
But (industrial) e-spionage on the other hand? Yup. Will happen 100%

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
view more: ‹ prev next ›