It refers to the affected models, not the cause. The apple silicon iMac was a complete redesign.
Bezier
joined 1 year ago
it often means having to run the game twice on the same machine.
Not quite that much. A sane game would run all players in the same simulation, assuming they're in the same map. Multiple cameras would increase the amount of stuff drawn on screen, but at least the amount of pixels to calculate stays same, which helps a lot.
I had low expectations before, but Starfield killed them completely. Starfield actually helped me get over worrying about TES6, because I just lost interest.
Didn't think of that, good point.
The inbreeding could also affect larger decisions in sneaky ways, like how it wants to compose the image. It would be bad if the generator started to exaggerate and repeat some weird ai tropes.
I would expect some kind of small artifacting getting reinforced in the process, if the approved output images aren't perfect.
That is not how it works. That's not how it works at all.
That should be easy on windows, but user permissions might also be enough for whatever it does.
I guess it's just normalized.
That's a lot of money they have stolen there.
This looks more like classic spambots than AI.
The thought was that it'd be closer to that, than the 12 times larger suggestion.
And yeah, I was definitely only taking hosting costs into account, because every instance is maintained by volunteers. I was also only thinking about large instances that benefit from economies scale and smarter management.
I took a quick glance at that thread, will have a more thorough pass later.
I find victim blaming counterproductive. It would be more helpful to discuss stronger consumer protection laws.