Bezier

joined 1 year ago
[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

That's amazing, though I'm not sure people living on the other side of my walls would appreciate it.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

No. But it's also not like I get 20 constantly, it was just the worst I've seen. Usually it's 2 to 5, I think.

I assume they're just collecting data on how many are users willing to do.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 25 points 4 months ago (3 children)

They knew I was committing crimes with my adblocker.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 82 points 4 months ago (24 children)

they wanted you to do two or three and that's absurd

Yea how about 20

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 5 points 4 months ago

I interpret it as the accused is the victim and the accuser is a grifter, but I'm still not sure about the full message.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

In that case I have majorly misunderstood some things before. I think the phrase should be given a bit more thought, because it really sounds like it's about believing all accusations.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 62 points 4 months ago

It really sounds like she has decided the boss was making advances and is interpreting everything as a sign to reinforce that belief.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 164 points 4 months ago (13 children)

renaming a draft presentation file with his initials “AJG” in brackets as standing for “A Jumbo Genital”.

asked her when a project would be finished, she told the tribunal he burst out shouting with an “extremely angry voice”, saying “I need date, date, date”. Ms Gasparova interpreted this as having been asked “the exact date when I would finally agree on sexual contact with him”

To indicate what details he required her to fill in he used XX, YY and ???? in the message, written in red. ‌The tribunal heard she interpreted the Xs as meaning kisses, the Ys as sexual contact of some kind and the question marks as when she would be “ready to engage in sexual acts”'.

This reads like satire. Did this really happen or is something important left out? Surely no one can understand things this wrong?

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 5 points 4 months ago

"The instance of the person who posted it" seems to be reasonable for comments, but not the thread.

I think it is not only reasonable, but better this way. The canonical server is the one the post originates from. Each server is responsible only for its own users and their content.

I don't see any difference between posts and comments either. Why is one ok and the other not?

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

well it wasn't for no reason, it was for stupid reason, which is different

Yeah, guess I ovesimplified a bit. For anyone not aware, it was one report of racism towards a delivery driver.

The accusation was completely false, and even if the guy actually were a racist pos, remotely disabling devices he paid for and owns is not a good road to go on.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 183 points 4 months ago (15 children)

This is what I fear the most with these platforms. They have these shitty automated moderation systems that can just decide to delete everything you have there on a whim. Already common on places like youtube and facebook, but it just keeps getting worse. Every site is pushing users into signing in with their google/microsoft/whatever accounts.

Remember the guy who lost access to his smart home when amazon banned him for no reason?

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's not like it'll disappear entirely, just that clueless idiots will stop shoving it everywhere it doesn't belong.

view more: ‹ prev next ›