Looks pretty neat.
Is there a way to have it run like a ram statistics monitor? I'd love to have this running in a terminal window to monitor my ram statistics.
Looks pretty neat.
Is there a way to have it run like a ram statistics monitor? I'd love to have this running in a terminal window to monitor my ram statistics.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/brave-browser-caught-redirecting-users-through-affiliate-links
I'm not going to defend Mozilla by any means, but if you care about privacy, you wouldn't use a browser based on Chrome anyway.
You could replace "Brave Browser" with Firefox and the statement would still be true.
At least Firefox wasn't caught hijacking affiliate links.
As someone with two kids who play games on the switch, physical carts keep me from having to buy every game two or three times.
So losing the ability to buy a game and share it between three switches will severely increase the costs of games for me.
If you want to fully wipe the disks of any data to start with, you can use a tool like dd
to zero the disks. First you need to figure out what your dive is enumerated as, then you wipe it like so:
sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX
From there, you need to decide if you're going to use them individually or as a pool.
!< s
I'm not disagreeing with anything you've said?
I'm saying that just adding Mozilla's PPA to your sources won't change apt's behavior when installing Firefox unless you tell apt to prefer the package offered by the Mozilla PPA.
As someone who uses Kubuntu as a daily driver, I'm well aware of the snap drama and have worked around it using the method I pasted above.
Even though it's an underhanded move by Cannonical, I'm still glad the OS is open source since it makes the workaround so trivial.
It takes a little more than just adding a different repository to your package manager, you have to tell apt which to prefer:
echo '
Package: *
Pin: origin packages.mozilla.org
Pin-Priority: 1000
Package: firefox*
Pin: release o=Ubuntu
Pin-Priority: -1' | sudo tee /etc/apt/preferences.d/mozilla
This is what I think is most likely as well. The capacity on the drive makes me think it's a SSD and they can just spontaneously fail.
This is why you always need backups. It's never a question of if, but rather when a drive will fail.
An inbound only DNS forwarding rule would be pointless. All DNS queries should be originating from within the network.
EDIT
I think I see what you're getting at. Assuming that the firewall is running on the NAS vs on the router.
The OP doesn't specify, but I would assume the firewall rule would be on the router, as that makes the most sense to force all DNS requests on the network to go through the pihole.
I agree.
So the solution, OP, is to set the DNS settings on your NAS to your router's internal IP so the firewall can redirect the traffic to your new port.
Never ask a company to pick between the right thing and profit.
It's fundamentally impossible for a publicly traded company not to choose profit over 'The Right Thing', fullstop. Shareholders feel that have a fundamental right to growth, and if Google's CEO were to choose 'The Right Thing' over profit, the shareholders can oust them in favor of a CEO willing to choose profits.
Enshittification is where every public company ends up, because the line MUST go up, no other alternative is acceptable.
Fucking same.
I deleted my main account once they first came out with the reddit recap, and deleted my replacement when they fucked RIF, never to return.
I still lurk without an account sometimes, but that's all they'll ever get out of me.