Bronzebeard

joined 1 day ago
[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No it wasn't. We were taking about streams monopoly status and epic being one of the few alternatives.

YOU were the one trying to deflect the conversation into business viability. Which your entire side tangent really only reinforces how obscene the monopoly hold off stream is, that trying to break into the market is so expensive.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Well yeah, fighting for market share against an entrenched monopoly isn't cheap. That's not a reason to cheer on the monopoly though.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 10 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

It's limited time, but also the selection these last few years has felt very uninspired. Everything is extremely derivative and been done to death.

There was a mass consolidation of developers/publishers recently, on top of further extended development cycles that has really limited any kind of variety we might have seen.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee -2 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

All retail establishments utilize loss leaders. It's not some underhanded duplicitous tactic, it's just a common business strategy

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee -2 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I'm not sure what you're responding to, but it wasn't anyone I said

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago

Those still aren't bots. Bot farms are literally a bunch of servers running computer programs. That's not the same thing as some online sweatshop pushing disinformation manually.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It decreases the spread. Cutting form the engagement means free people who aren't already subscribed to that content will see it, since there's fewer people arguing with it. Which means those who are susceptible to falling for it have less chance to even encounter it, meaning fewer fall into it.

Even if the incentive to create the trolls has changed, the counter to letting it spread hasn't.