You can also install ad guard home as an add on INSIDE Home Assistant. Works great!
Buelldozer
Combo of ADHD and living through the 2000s with Internet Explorer where ads often installed malware and viruses. If you DIDN'T use an Ad Blocker you were playing a game of Russian Roulette every time you opened a web page.
Popups, pop unders, blaring audio, malware, slow page loads...ads are a scourge.
Funny, I've been calling Flock the same thing.
I dunno if it's exciting but I do have and use an Entra joined and InTune managed Linux Mint laptop with a full security stack loaded as described above. It works.
Yep but...
Here's Microsoft - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity/devices/sso-linux?tabs=debian-install%2Cdebian-update%2Cdebian-uninstall
Google has a variety of IDM methods including Ubuntu Authd and Secure Cloud LDAP. There's also 3rd party tools like JumpCloud, ScaleOrange, etc.
Okta appears to have ASA and OPA although I'm not familiar with either of them. Ping has PingID and Ping Federate, although again I haven't used either of them.
So depending on your cloud and needs the IdM / IAM is either available NOW or it will be very soon. 😀
The corporate crowd will stay on Windows because they benefit from propping up other corporations.
I wouldn't be so sure. An interesting indicator of the shift that many of you wouldn't see is how many vendors of management and security software have put out Linux versions in the past 12 months. I'm talking about stuff like RMM (Remote Monitoring & Management), EDR / MDR (Endpoint Detection & Response / Managed Detection & Response) client side DNS filtering software, and other things.
This tooling is for managing and securing endpoints used by companies, either by internal IT or by MSPs. These vendors wouldn't be making and releasing these tools unless they were being asked for them AND there was going to be stead long term demand.
Turns out that once a companies stuff is in the cloud its users really don't need MS Windows anymore so as long as you can centrally manage and secure it Linux makes a perfectly fine endpoint OS.
It ain't Ubiquiti selling that gear to them. Better luck next time.
This is a narrative being pushed by a capital investment group that's shorting Ubiquiti stock.
Oh look, a hit piece put out by a media company that's owned by a capital investment group that is shorting UIs stock...I wonder what this could be about?!
Ubiquiti may not be blameless but this article is ridiculous.
Ubi isn't selling this stuff to the Russians and neither are their vendors. Their vendors, most of them in the article are from overseas, are selling them to middle-men who sell them to another middle-man who then physically gets the equipment into Russian hands where it potentially goes through ANOTHER middle man before its used by Russian troops. There's almost no way to control that and if you read carefully the "legal experts" quoted toward the bottom of the article use some very careful language in order to not tell you this.
You can't just "shut it down" either, although even the article notes that Ubi is trying. Most of the gear that's getting into Russian military hands for use in the war is stuff that you have probably never used. It's PowerBeam and NanoBeam product that's most often used by WISPs, which makes sense because that's precisely how Russian forces are using it. What the article isn't telling you is that this stuff does NOT need hooked to the Cloud in order to function. In fact it doesn't need Internet access at all and so there's no way for Ubi to know where it's being used or even that it's been powered up!
Even if Ubi can tell that the equipment is powered on and in use they may not know where it's at with sufficient accuracy or knowledge to do anything about it. The damn thing could be on the Internet via Starlink sitting in Pokrovsk. On December 1st, 2025 was a SL system with Ubi gear attached to it in Pokrovsk being operated by Russia or Ukraine? There's literally no way for Ubi or anyone else to know.
As for Ubi doing more if you read the whole article you'll find that more than a few of these bad distributors HAVE been caught and shut down across the globe which almost certainly means that Ubi is helping at some level.
In short the article looks bad but when you start breaking down the individual points it quickly falls apart, especially when the media company behind it has a monetary interest in sinking Ubiquiti's stock.
Nah, according to the article this is mostly the WISP type stuff, particularly the Power and Nano beam products meant for Long Range Point to Point / Multi Point connections. This isn't routers / switches / etc.
This has been predicted and worked towards since the 90s.