CarbonIceDragon

joined 1 year ago
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 3 points 7 months ago

tbf, google glass and similar are AR rather than VR. Honestly the technology has been improving over the last few years, though not in as dramatic a fashion as when it went from a rare lab or obscure tech hobbyist thing to something mainstream consumers could buy, if expensively, more in the same sense that things like computer gpus get a little bit more powerful each generation but stay fundamentally being the same kind of thing. The cost has also gone down a bit on the low end (though the higher end is still thousands, its possible to get a decent headset for the mid hundreds, or low hundreds if you get a refurbished or lightly used one). I dont think it will really revolutionize all that much, but I do think it will gradually become a reasonably significant area of the entertainment market, in the same way that things like video game consoles arent revolutionary technology beyond a certain segment of the entertainment market, but are still common enough to be economically and culturally relevant. With the current prices and use case, video game consoles are essentially what they are. Im personally exited to see where the tech goes, even though it probably wont be the next smartphone the way some claim.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ironically I have had good enough experiences with one or two Chinese brands to probably look at their stuff first whenever I ultimately replace/upgrade what I've got from them, but they certainly aren't the "spam random letters to game Amazon's systems" sort of brands and are really only slightly cheaper than the equivalents from elsewhere.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 2 points 7 months ago

Funnily enough the instance my masto is on also uses that motto, tho for an entirely different reason

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 57 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What a scam, my fursona didnt cost me anything

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 29 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy a lot of the prerequisites

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 3 points 8 months ago

I think think for awhile as a very young kid I thought the former (by the time I learned about hard drives I knew what a monitor and computer were), but in my defense, my first exposure to computers and what my family had at that age was one of those old imac computers that really did have the screen and the computer in the same device.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 17 points 8 months ago (7 children)

I mean, hypothetically couldn't they mix some proprietary chemical formula into the ink and incorporates some device that analyses the ink chemistry and doesn't print if that proprietary mixture is not present?

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 36 points 8 months ago (9 children)

I could have used this when I was a kid playing games and would go "sorry, my cpu is bad" whenever I had lag issues even though the cpu was actually okay and it was really because of playing on a laptop with integrated graphics and a spotty internet connection, because at the time I thought CPU was just a short way of saying ComPUter...

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 2 points 8 months ago

I mean the supply and demand for the trucking companies. Shipping is a vital service, if it had high taxes, it would have to dramatically increase prices for their shipping service, but they shouldn't go out of business because everyone else would still pay those dramatically high prices, because they'd have to

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 14 points 8 months ago

That depends on if the tax is sufficient to cover the societal costs of driving that mile or not. Not every use of electricity degrades public infrastructure to the same extent, so if the maintenance burden an EV adds is more than what the electricity tax brings in, then additional taxes to make up the difference would make sense.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That should mean they don't go bankrupt though. If their service is vital, people will pay for it even if the prices rise. It would mean an increase in prices for goods admittedly as the stores try to recoup the increased logistics costs, but intuitively I'd imagine the financial impact on the end customer wouldn't be as much because they're paying for the road upkeep either way, just via higher taxes in the current state and via increased prices in the new one.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

If you don't want your posts/content to appear on other websites from the one you posted it on, why would you use a federated platform in the first place? Isn't the entire point of these kinds of platforms that this kind of content is shared between sites?

And on a mostly unrelated side note, that bit about people trying to force the website to display CP to get the owner in legal trouble is exactly the reason why strict liability crimes that don't care about intent are a bad idea

view more: ‹ prev next ›