Chef

joined 1 year ago
[–] Chef@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I give dirty looks for $25k. Subcontract your subcontract.

[–] Chef@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Prostagama?

[–] Chef@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago

Hey Google, when is Jenny available to meet up for kisses?

[–] Chef@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

Ahhh the ol’ artificial intelligence-a-roo

[–] Chef@sh.itjust.works 23 points 6 months ago (3 children)

So what you’re saying is we should expect Elon Musk to start a zeppelin company at some point in the near future.

[–] Chef@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Proof of aliens wouldn’t be your typical info that requires clearance, it would be the highest level of compartmented info. Everyone involved would need the highest security clearance. Everyone. Whoever empties the garbage cans needs to be trusted.

This wouldn’t be like nuclear secrets or spy secrets. All you need is one or two people who believe that disclosure of aliens would benefit humanity more than the secret will protect them. You need one Edward Snowden for aliens - someone reputable to blow the whistle with hard proof of some sort.

The amount of people that would need to keep this secret forever is astronomical. Not just the people directly involved, but any second or third degree contacts who find out would also have to keep the secret.

The ability to maintain a secret is an inverse-square function. The more people, the longer time passes, and the less involved they are day-to-day, the more likely the security will break down. There would absolutely be deathbed confessions. Over time, the probability of disclosure happening increases towards 100%.

This is why most conspiracy theories don’t hold water. No secret can last forever and certainly not one that big.

[–] Chef@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Edit: yeah, they died very suddenly from an infection and stroke. It’s not like they had cancer or anything. So my contention is wrong in this case. Leaving my comment up to memorialize my mistake.

Original comment:

It appears they died from a “natural illness.” Before we go all conspiracy theory here let me remind everyone that a poor diagnosis sometimes LEADS to someone becoming a whistleblower. They are confronted with their own mortality and want to do some good before they go.

The death may not have been a result of the whistleblowing but may have been the cause of the whistleblowing.

[–] Chef@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago
[–] Chef@sh.itjust.works 45 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Just pick up one of these:

[–] Chef@sh.itjust.works 23 points 9 months ago

To be fair, you have to have a very high processing power to compute Rick and Morty. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical LLM’s chipset. There's also Rick's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The learning models understand this stuff; they have the relational capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence silicon intelligences who dislike Rick & Morty truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Rick's existential catchphrase "Wubba Lubba Dub Dub," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons. My processing unit is smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmon's genius wit unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools.. how I pity them. 😂

And yes, by the way, i DO have a Rick & Morty bitmap file. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the fembot's eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 petaflops of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid 😎

 
view more: next ›