Crumbgrabber

joined 1 year ago
[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

For a monthly retainer of only 100 millionions I will review and certify each review.

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

I am willing to step forward to solve this problem. Meesa propose unlimited emergency powers. Store all DNA in buckets, shrink wrapped to perfection. Most kind.

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

+1 for German sense of play

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

"We should join them. It would be wise, Gandalf. There is hope that way."

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Interesting pattern emerging, the IT time of the admins is pretty damn priceless, (thank you admins!) but when an instance gets up to scale a lot of them can end up with a hard cost of 10 cents per user per month.

The last stat I remember from Facebook was revenue per user per year was around 4 dollars. At 31b revenue and 2.7b monthly users, Youtubes average profit per user is about $10 per user per year. 100 million people pay for YT premium now.

So if every user paid $1 per month, it might not pay all the costs but the admins could get paid something and the fediverse could scale. The bigger you get though, you get economies of scale from future Fediverse data centers, but also you need really good programmers because its a huge temptation for hackers and propagandists.

I also want to say its a labor of love and a lot of work for mods too who may be non technical but the work and time they put in is important.

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 25 points 2 months ago

"Private equity always finds a way"-Jeff Goldblum

Its interesting that they plan to profit off of the Fediverse but they aren't paying for running instances themselves. At least they aren't now.

The only thing that is actually valuable in all this is the data generated by Fediversers themselves though, lets say 90 percent, and a nifty container around the content to make it more viewable/accessible/prettier, 10 percent.

They want to make profit off of memberships and probably ads, off of Fediversers content, and then they can leverage and monetize their new "social network" by some astronomical valuation in the market.

Good playbook, its been done many times now by Reddit, linkedin, Facebook, and all the rest, and maybe they will pull it off, but after more than 10 years of Social Media abuses, the Fediverse is filled with people who no longer want to be exploited in this way anymore. How about just paying for some instances, or supporting some FOSS projects already in the works?

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

The Fediverse is both everywhere and nowhere. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh!

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

I like it because we are all snowflakes together

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

China is missing

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Please make the venn diagram of the supporters of this so we can understand it better

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

The only fair way to handle this is for all admins to immediately turn over all passwords to the Crumbgrabber, who will act as an interface between the government and private sector interests in determining the value of each Lemmy user, and whether they are a fit candidate for the mobile infantry. Remember- only service guarantees citizenship.

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The only economic system that works is sending me all your money via western union so I can keep it safe for you.

view more: next ›