Dave

joined 2 years ago
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yup, seems the issue for this is still open.

I have local storage for my photos, then backup to object storage using Borgmatic and Rclone to B2. But you're right, you can't directly use object storage with Immich.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Local storage on a VPS is expensive, and I've never been happy with a lower powered server serving media. Personally I self-host and send a backup to Backblaze B2 for offsite (using Rclone).

I use Borgmatic for incremental, deduplicated backups but make sure you save your encryption key somewhere you can access it if your house burns down.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 month ago

I think you might be right. Others are talking about a rocky start but reading through the recent release notes it seems like a potentially unrelated issue with a release of a new timeline.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm really happy to see this post acknowledge speed issues where there are many items, 100k+. I have around this and have always found Immich to be laggy, while others say how it's the fastest ever.

I will have to give it another go.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 month ago

I'm feeling very lucky now!

We have a national grid that is shared by all power companies, and is open to all. Power companies just buy and sell power on the grid based on a spot pricing system. Because of this, we have very easy movement between power companies, and have dozens to choose from, leading to a lot of competition. Mine is a tiny company that specialises in solar, having sell to grid rates well above most companies.

The company that did our solar install had their top recommended companies, they worked out the best for us, and organised getting set up with them. Was I pretty nice experience to have everything taken care of like that!

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Interesting! Your power seems super expensive.

We pay a daily lines maintenance charge of 60c, then 29c/kWh during the day and a little under 27c for off peak night time. Then add 15% tax to these. These are in NZD, so almost halve them to get USD (e.g. 60cNZD is 35cUSD)

We also get about 17.5c for each kWh sold to the grid. So to sell it in the day and buy back at night is a 10c additional cost. A 10kWh battery can save a max of $1 per night, meaning it's really hard to make your money back on a battery that's $10-15k NZD on it's own.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What an odd pricing structure! I would normally expect higher usage to mean lower prices per unit.

I guess that gives you a large incentive to have at least a little solar, as there would be a big financial benefit.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Wait, it gets more expensive when you use more?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Net metering is potentially better, as you are effectively getting free night usage based ob day generation. My setup pays me, but I get paid 20c per Kw (NZ dollar) and pay about 30c to buy, so there's a 10c difference. Just as long as whatever you lose on 31st Dec is not too high, you'd be better off than me.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 14 points 1 month ago (14 children)

I recently got a solar system and came to the conclusion that if you can sell power back to the grid (not everyone can) for some reasonable percentage of what it costs to buy it, then it will always be worth it to be connected (assuming you already are).

Quite simply, if you have enough solar capacity to get you through the winter (no house is going to have months of battery storage), then you will always be creating far more than you need in the summer. Selling this excess will easily cover any costs associated to being on the grid.

Also at current prices batteries are good for backup power only, it's always cheaper to sell excess power to the grid in the day and buy it back at night than it is to have battery capacity to get through the night. I worked out it would take 40 years for our battery to pay for itself (assuming the battery kept a constant battery capacity for 40 years...) but less than 10 years for the rest of the system to pay for itself.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 10 points 2 months ago

Made up spellings are bad, but good luck searching for anything that isn't a made up spelling or two words put together.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 months ago

I think versioning is the better option.

are you writing about losing the backUp drive?

No, losing your main version. Imagine you have a computer with syncthing and a server where it syncs to. If you chose no deletions, then it will sync all files to the server but all the stuff you deleted (draft documents, random files, photos from that time your kid held the camera button on your phone down and took 3000 photos in 30 seconds) will be deleted from your computer but still there on your server.

When you computer gets struck by lightning and everything is destroyed but the server is fine, now you have to re-sort out all your files because all the stuff you deleted is still on the server version.

Your suggestion of enabling the option to keep previous versions is probably cleaner. Personally I prefer to keep previous versions and deduplicate to save space.

view more: ‹ prev next ›