Dave

joined 1 year ago
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How long is it taking you to eat your burger!?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 6 points 3 months ago

I'm keen to upgrade the guts of mine, do they have a schedule for releasing the next AMD mainboard? As mentioned the current available one was released last year.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well hey, sounds like you might be able to help. Lemmy devs are actively soliciting opinions on lemmy votes, maybe you could have a say? Most of the comments are around "votes are already sort of public" therefore either a) make them actually public so we aren't pretending they aren't, or b) keep them hidden, a little less public is better than completely public.

Perhaps you can come in with a c) option to make votes even less public?

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4967

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Under activitypub, a lemmy community is kind of like a user (actually an activitypub group). When I post here with my lemmy.nz account to this lemmy.world community, lemmy.nz sends my comment to lemmy.world who then sends it to sh.itjust.works for you to see. The community is the controller of all interactions within the community. In this case, lemmy.world is the official source of how many upvotes this post has. And each vote is validated using the user's public key to ensure it actually came from that specific user - a standard part of ActivityPub.

So would lemmy.world assign a token for your votes? If your instance assigned the token, Lemmy.world would not be able to validate against your user's public key. If Lemmy.world assigns the token, it would only be valid in lemmy.world communities, as other instances would have to assign their own token. And both sh.itjust.works and lemmy.world admins could still see the real association.

Also, changing how votes work would break compatibility with other ActivityPub software (e.g. Mastodon could no longer interpret an upvote as a favourite, Mbin would't be able to retrieve any data about the votes unless they specifically changed to work in the Lemmy way instead of using standard ActivityPub).

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago (5 children)

How does this work? The community issues federates votes but with a linked token instead of a linked user? How do you track vote manipulation across different communities on different instances?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 31 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Admins need to know if the votes/likes coming in are legitimate, else they should block them. It’s too easy to abuse anonymous votes to affect how content is ranked.

This is a very real problem right now. Admins that are on to it use the votes to identify swarms of users that follow each other around upvoting each other's spam/troll posts.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 13 points 3 months ago

I don't know why but I chuckled at this more than anything else I've seen on the internet today. Maybe just laughing at my dumb brain trying to work it out before seeing the text and realising it was AI.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago

Just to be clear, I think registration applications are necessary for anyone without a team of admins across the world.

I'm not saying these instances requiring applications are doing a bad thing. Just that it's a barrier to entry and given the non-commercial decentralised nature of Lemmy we will never be able to hire thousands of staff to handle reports like Facebook does.

It's a new problem requiring a new solution, and while I think Mastodon hasn't solved it yet, I think they are ahead of Lemmy.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I explained in another comment to someone else, but to recap Lemmy.world has lemmy's registration applications feature turned on, but behind the scenes they run a bot to approve everyone who types the requested thing in the box. You sign up, type the thing in the box, and you get immediate access.

Compare this sign up process to the instance that the Lemmy devs run on Lemmy.ml.

Now to be clear, I'm not saying it's unjustified. Trolls and spammers are a problem on Lemmy and we need more tools to help. Most instances require registration applications and I think that's necessary for anyone without a team of admins across the world.

But that doesn't change that it's a big barrier to entry. Facebook has thousands of people able to respond to reports in a short period of time. Decentralised non-commercial Lemmy instances can never meet this, so we have a problem that needs a solution.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yes they are a good candidate I think. Curious about their sign ups though. Lemmy.world asks people to write “I agree to the TOS” in the answer box. If you do, a bot automatically approves you, if you don't, a bot automatically declines you. There's no waiting time.

Lemm.ee states In the “Answer” box below, please state that you agree to follow the lemm.ee instance rules (found in the sidebar of our front page), which has no specific phrase you need to answer, so I'm guessing they manually approve them?

I honestly think registration applications are a huge barrier to anyone not already on the fediverse.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We are fine, but it's not fixed. I have a second VPS running in Finland, using this queue batcher. The Lemmy.world team kindly set up their server to point to this VPS instead of the actual Lemmy.nz server, then the VPS collects all the events and sends them to the Lemmy.nz server in batches of 100.

It keeps us up to date, but it's cheating 😆

Last I heard Aussie.zone doesn't have this setup, but they do have a prefetcher (or rather, Nothing4You, who made the queue batcher, is running a prefetcher for them). This basically takes the new comments and posts from Lemmy.world, and sends a request to Aussie.zone to fetch that post. Because this happens outside the normal federation queue it can be done in parallel. It means when Aussie.zone receives the federated activity from Lemmy.world, it already has it, so it can reply quicker and process more events per second. Lemmy clears out activities older than a week in a weekly scheduled job, which is why you will see Aussie.zone's backlog drop a bit once a week. They won't get that content from Lemmy.world, it's just lost. Because of the prefetcher, it's likely just up/down votes (which can't be prefetched).

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago

Oh definitely some. At the time we were still in the tail of the reddit surge, we were getting plenty of valid registrations and spam was only starting to take off (which was the reason for closing registrations).

But to my point, I think back to my first Lemmy experience and remember trying to work out which server I should join even though I already had a basic idea about the Fediverse from Mastodon. And I just chose the biggest in the end bpecause how do you choose? Even today I would be wary about joining any server that didn't have lots of people.

And later I remember hearing about Beehaw then finding a registration application page and not creating an account.

These happened well before the reddit exodus, and I never really got into Lemmy until that happened and I joined Beehaw.

view more: ‹ prev next ›