DebatableRaccoon

joined 2 years ago
[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

You definitely aren't wrong.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Nah. An Apple exec would outright tell you you're using it wrong despite knowing of an inherent flaw in the design and offer to sell you a new one for even more money.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

It'd be pretty stupid to get any amount of upset over someone having an opinion. Factual inaccuracies are something else though.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Not whatever way you've been using it by the sounds of things.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You'll never convince the zealots who believe sun shines out of Torvalds' asshole.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Just need to work on it, huh? Oddly, that something I almost never need to do with Windows unless I'm doing something extremely niche.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca -2 points 5 months ago (10 children)

Doesn't sound like you're using it right.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

You seem rather fixated on Edge, unlike anyone who's ever used Windows.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I guess some of us are more astute when it comes to the difference between clicking something and needing to open a terminal and remember strings of commands before. Oh, and being intrinsically familiar with a forum.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago (34 children)

You're right, broader compatibility and being more user-friendly serves no use to anyone

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 months ago

They know about the piracy and are actively removing copyrighted content. This has seen a lot of files going poof from its usage on pornographic forums and is now considered unreliable for such purposes. Not sure if this is going to spill over into other pirated content but I don't see why it wouldn't.

view more: ‹ prev next ›