Deceptichum

joined 8 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Really explains the state of the world where even on Lemmy you have people coming in to fight for big businesses invading our people spaces.

Our species is fucked.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah? That makes perfect sense, don’t use it beyond a basic device verification, for example verifying if the device has already been used in a promo or stolen.

Those are instances where you need to check the device itself not the user.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Eugh MKBHD. Biggest tech stooge around, what’s the bet this is a puff piece for some company.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (17 children)

How many often are you planning on replacing the battery in your phone that it would wear out the panel?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can I watch it in 2025?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 28 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 18 points 3 months ago (5 children)

At some point the Fediverse is going to have to protect itself from Europe.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The information from 4 days was not parsed on, that’s why I chose something so recent.

And LLM can be trained to do this. Literally when it looked at the Petrel it did things humans do such as take note of the dark colours common in seabirds, the small size, etc. and it used those points to reach its conclusion.

We don’t do anything special as humans, we take in data, process it, and spit out a result. It’s why a child has to be taught basic concepts such as creativity or socialising.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

You asked if it could do I task I wasn’t even capable of doing, and this was your assessment of consciousness.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

It might be able to pick those things out, I certainly couldn't.

Edit: So ChatGPT correctly identified a new species from 4 days ago as a type of Storm Petrel and a new flower from Sri Lanka as an Orchidaceae. Far better than I could do.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (10 children)

No, I’m not suggesting that.

I’m suggesting that if we don’t even understand how consciousness works for ourselves, we cannot make claims about how it will look for other things.

Deterministically free will does not exist, if we cannot exercise free will we cannot have independent thoughts just the same as a machine.

Truth is we don’t really know shit, we’re biological machines that are able to think they’re in control of themselves based on inputs. If we ever discover true AGI it will be on accident as we fiddle with technologies such as LLMs or any other complex models.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 3 months ago (12 children)

Do I “think” or does my brain pick the closest neuron and spit out a function based on that input?

If we could recreate the universe, would I do the exact same thing in the exact same situation?

view more: ‹ prev next ›