One sentence literally saying your views on the subject are deplorable are great evidence of your shitty views when that person is one of the most trusted figures in your instance.
Why do you think anything about Rimu not liking tankies validates your deplorable views? That was clearly an attempt at deception.
So why don't you go post that in reply to user in your instance saying this about you?
The rest of the comment isn't about you, so why would I include it?
What a deceptive reply you've made trying to frame it as if I left out information that reflected differently on you.
Even your chief propagandist agrees that you're deplorable.
Way more features, actually gets updates, and awesome devs who take on feedback and make changes.
Excuse me that's transphobic and covid denying.
I said nothing about votes.
I'm talking about the hatejerk comm where they brigaded from the last time this image was posted and spammed it with misinformation.
No, only Lemmy.
You mean the lemmy.ml admin? The tankie one trying to deflect and make PieFed out to be the bad guy?
PieFed updates faster, is responsive to suggestions and user concerns, has way more features such as polls, topics (groups of communities that can be made by users, helps to browse all comms related to a topic) automated posts, it combines cross-post comments into 1 page, etc.
And the Lemmy devs are transphobes, genocide deniers, support Russia invading Ukraine, etc. so there's an ethical component to people not supporting it through using it.
Because I'm sure "they'll" come and rage here once they see this post I'll pre-empt it and say the dev for PieFed is not perfect, no one is, and they've got some code around minimising meme images and 4chan content based on their personal preferences, but that stuffs all optional and can be turned on or off by the instance admins.
Sadly that only works for scrapers, content engaging bots are immune to it.