EldritchFeminity

There's another comment further up about a statistic showing that people who pirate content are more likely to spend more money on content as well compared to people who don't pirate content. It seems that there's a correlation between people who pirate things and people who care about the ethical treatment of creators. Stuff like people who pirate music from Spotify and then spend money to buy the music from the band on Bandcamp.

In that context, I have an even harder time caring about people pirating from the megacorps when they're supporting creators at the same time. That's closing in on Robin Hood style activities at that point.

Should've gone for the thermite, then at least we could call him a "hot" boomer.

I would disagree with this sentiment on a basic game design level. I don't know about the Zelda games, I didn't care enough about BotW to play more than a few hours, but designing a large map that incorporates multiple biomes in a believable way is much more difficult than creating a bunch of smaller levels that don't have to have any relation to each other in the slightest. You can get away with a lot more in terms of map geometry and set pieces when you load into each level individually.

This is obviously different when you're talking about Bethesda-style load into every building style environments vs Elden Ring "You see that castle in the distance? You'll be going in there eventually" design, but the fact that Bethesda makes their interiors separate from the rest of the world is how they cheap out on their games. It's less hardware intensive and you can cheat a lot more in your design. And on a gameplay level that goes for Ubisoft-style collectathon map objects (and Zelda shrines in this case), but that's not unique to open-world games - it's a lazy cop-out that game devs have used forever to pad out their games. Collecting all the secret skulls in Halo is the same thing, but because it's implemented well and doesn't drag on forever with no reward like most open-world collectibles, it feels totally different.

Honestly, probably both. The fact that stuff isn't being deleted anymore and that they make carve-outs in the rules for hate against specific minorities would embolden people to post more hateful content.

Personal responsibility only gets you so far when the big money actively fights against it. I think the answer lies in both holding companies like Google to higher standards as well as improving access to the knowledge we need to navigate what the world has become. It doesn't help anybody when the FBI has recommended people use an ad blocker for over a decade but nobody has ever heard them say it.

I think this law requires you to upload a photo of your ID and says that it's the website's fault if underage people use it and they face a hefty fine. It's a lot more than the standard "click to pinky promise that you're definitely 18" because PornHub already has that.

Unfortunately, the "used intelligently and responsibly" part is why people dislike AI - they don't trust companies or people to use it that way (and for good reason based on the results so far).

Plus, it's not gonna put everything back into Pandora's Box. What we're in is a societal and cultural arms race where AI is just another escalation that's being used by both sides.

Everyone who disagrees with you is a bot, probably from Russia. You are very smart.

Where did they say that? They just said bots in general. It's well known that Russia has been running a propaganda campaign across social media platforms since at least the 2016 elections (just like the US is doing on Russian and Chinese social media, I'm sure. They do it on Americans as well. We're probably the most propangandized country on the planet), but there's plenty of incentive for corpo bots to be running their own campaigns as well.

Or are you projecting for some reason? What do you get from defending Putin?

Because Bluesky is centralised.

You say that like that isn't exactly what the majority of people want. When I first left Reddit, I was trying to explain Lemmy and federated services to some friends and one of them immediately replied with "why would you want that?" And this was from a guy who owned and operated his own TeamSpeak server just for his friends to use.

The average person wants a service that's easy to use first and foremost, and that is always going to be easier to do with a big centralized one owned and operated by a large company. They just want to be able to make an account and connect with friends and content. They don't care about things like privacy until it actively harms them.

The short of it is that he was an entry point for the MAGA pipeline years back. I don't know if he still schills for white supremacist podcasts and the like anymore, though.

I mean, he did a little more than "one too many Nazi jokes." Including, but not limited to, supporting white supremacists and advertising their social media and books on his channel and social media platforms.

The number of people that I've heard (especially teenagers) arguing that "it's normal over there" was honestly disheartening. He was a major component of the MAGA pipeline in the years leading up to Trump's first presidency.