Engywuck

joined 1 year ago
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I mean, they don't tell you which part of ToS you violated because you may come up with some way to circumvent it.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They do this on purpose, to avoid workarounds.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Because they prefer to use something else.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Nothing new. Mozilla could disappear tomorrow and a few dozens of people may notice it, if even. They're basically useless at this point.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 21 points 2 months ago

Let me just say.... LOL

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

In the case of Brave (or Vivaldi, to a certain extent) it doesn't matter too much, as it has a very capable built-in adblocker. It's not an extension, so it is not going to be weakened by MV3.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

The need for latex, in 1999.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I have a couple of no-brand SATA-USB enclosers with some jmicron chipset. Can't remember the exact chipset right now, as my RPi is not working ATM (see edit).

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

sudo smartctl -a /dev/sdX should do the job

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I use something like this, a no-brand enclosure.

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (11 children)

I'm using a couple of cheap Kingston A400 for my setup (120 and 480 GB) and they work just fine. One thing I noticed is that the 120 GB one's health went down to 92%, from 100%, in "just" one year (smart parameter). But that's implies a lifetime of more that 12 years, so I'm not excessively concerned.

EDIT: of course, just after writing this comment the smaller SSD began to behave strangely (errors in dmesg).

view more: ‹ prev next ›