ExtantHuman

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Yes, I read that. It did not clarify what I was asking.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Does total include the Old Spend?...and what is Package Only? None of these numbers seem to add up to each other. Or are they also separate.

Also what lazy dev just posted the query column names instead of decoding them for the end user

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Lol. That 600+ is JUST the extra tax. That's on top of the base price

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Why do you even care? Some of them still have living relatives who came from the old country.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Because they're both predominantly Catholic communities...

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No one is claiming a nationality. They're claiming an ethnicity, a heritage. You being hung up on this distinction is on you. Not the people you go out of your way to misinterpret.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, it often involves being Catholic and having massive families

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

Well Yeah, it's that important.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

That's not true at all. They've always been building them in parallel. Did they shift some of the devs to get the final push to finish SQ42? Recently? Yes. Was it the majority of the devs working on SC? No.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

And every bad one.

None of which I would call games.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

So the exact same reason they tried to ban tiktok...except this one actually happened.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Having a couple people coming up with ideas for the game while the rest of the team works on a different game is not the same as being in full development that entire time, like Star citizen has

view more: next ›