Your election results suggest otherwise.
FaceDeer
joined 2 years ago
Aha, a crime wave! Deploy the National Guard!
“The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.”
― James D. Nicoll
A perfectly cromulent word.
Now we're "vibe vibing?"
Which is not relevant to the actual use case for AI being discussed. There's no direct AI involvement in editing articles being proposed here.
I don't see how this fits into the actual case being discussed here.
The situation currently is that a newbie editor whose article is deleted gets presented with a simple "your article was deleted" message. The proposition is to have an AI flesh that out with a "possibly for the following reasons:" Explanation. How is that worse?
All that stuff about paying less and threatening the worker class is irrelevant. This is Wikipedia, its editors and administrators are all unpaid volunteers.
There are lots of non-proprietary AI models out there, some of them comparable in quality to ChatGPT. Wikipedia could run it themselves if they wanted, no "corpo involvement."
They want to handle lots of prompts.
What about any of this remotely connects to "rewriting history and eliminating freedom of speech?"
As if any bike lanes will remain in this scenario.