No, they're useful because they produce useful machine code.
FaceDeer
joined 8 months ago
Oh no, they accommodated our desires and removed the requirement that we hated. The bastards.
All industrial users pay lower, because they're able to apply economies of scale and locate themselves in places with lower power costs. Some of them are big enough that the utilities will build power lines and plants specifically to make electricity cheaper. It's not just a matter of "oh, they're rich, so we'll charge them less."
Wait... while true that that sounds like not hallucination then, what does that have to do with this discussion?
Because that's exactly what happened here. When someone Googles "how can I make my cheese stick to my pizza better?" Google does a web search that comes up with various relevant pages. One of the pages has some information in it that includes the suggestion to use glue in your pizza sauce. The Google Overview AI is then handed the text of that page and told "write a short summary of this information." And the Overview AI does so, accurately and without hallucination.
"Hallucination" is a technical term in LLM parliance. It means something specific, and the thing that's happening here does not fit that definition. So the fact that my socks example is not a hallucination is exactly my point. This is the same thing that's happening with Google Overview, which is also not a hallucination.
One of the common arguments I hear against technological advancement is "but what if some sociopath brews up a pandemic virus in their garage!"
The FDA is monitoring the corporations that are working on this sort of thing. As is mentioned in the title of this thread.
I wasn't. I pointed out that no significant blockchains used GPUs (especially not Ethereum, the main NFT-supporting blockchain, which has transitioned to proof-of-stake instead of proof-of-work). That puts them outside the question of "wastefulness" altogether, and irrelevant to the subject at hand.