FauxPseudo

joined 1 year ago
[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Could be worse. It could be a Cisco WS-C3650 series switch.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Dan is the guy that knows stuff. Jordan is the loud sidekick comic relief.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I keep refreshing my pod feed waiting for the next episode.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I am waiting for the next episode to drop. Biggest episode ever.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Please, let's not do this. Lets just enjoy sites that aren't toxic without making them toxic by written articles with headlines like this.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've seen the effect. It's just like after Brazil cut Twitter off. My very niche account has been gaining new followers by the hour.

I have no idea how people interested in Heathcliff are being found by new people. Much less people interested in Heathcliff without Heathcliff.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This seems more like an announcement for a wallpaper contest. Though that's pretty much what an Xfce update should be. Keeping it basic.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

OEMs only recently started offering 5+ years of security fixes. Two years was common until just 6 years ago. Apple got a lot of crap for not supporting older models but the truth is they supported longer than anyone else and only cut support when the hardware literally couldn't take it. Yet everyone ignored that most android makers might not even release a single update much less more than the two years worth needed to cover a phone for a two year contract.

I don't like saying that because I can't stand apple devices. But it's what happened. Then the EU started getting involved. They hated all this ewaste caused by people constantly upgrading. IT security people were speaking up too because phones were a complete risk with people using them for work but not getting updates that stopped them from being owned. It was getting bad for OEMs from multiple angles and they needed to act before the US government made them. And all those factors are the only reasons we are just now seeing all phones come with 5+ year plans.

As right to repair laws get integrated into new releases we will actually be able to take advantage of these 5+ year plans because we will be able to replace the batteries that are normally useless after three years.

I wish most phones had a battery saver option that would stop charge at 80% unless you manually overrode it each and every time you wanted to go over. This would dramatically cut down on the need to replace batteries.

But here is the rub. Even if you convince the majority logically that their phone is still good at year three they are going to upgrade at year two when the phone is paid off. The people that use phones as an identity and brand marker are still going to upgrade as fast as new devices come out.

And devices are going to continue to come out yearly. If you don't ship a new flagship product each year then shareholders will revolt. There must always be something new for the customer. Technology moves fast. If you are an OEM not releasing then you are an OEM that isn't keeping up.

All these forces of market, psychology, legal and repairability and more fight each other to create a situation where most people will upgrade in two years or less. Only a small portion of people will ever try to get 5+ years out of a device. Even the population trying to get 3 years will be two standard deviations out of the majority. Even if the battery is replaceable and the security patches keep coming.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Never make it without a ton of subsidies...

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Read the room

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Egypt didn't use slaves to build the pyramids. They used paid skilled workers. We have their living areas and pay receipts. You are working with outdated information. Cathedrals cover a 1700 year period and multiple labor strategies. I'm sure some were built with slaves but the majority weren't and slavery was all but absent for the majority of the period unless you count serfdom, but serfs didn't have the skills to build them so they don't count.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Literally true.

Socrates -> Plato -> Aristotle -> Alexander

Sagan -> NDT -> ?

Fortunately we are alive to see the original and the successor. Unfortunately NDT has become a greatest hits jukebox and hasn't produced anything new and noteworthy in a long time. I'm looking forward to the next generation. I'm definitely cautious of what the generation after that does.

view more: next ›