It's still true regardless. Bone Density has a direct correlation with physical activity, especially for the young.
FiniteBanjo
joined 8 months ago
When I was a kid I was always moving around, going place. Incredibly unsafe, but nobody in my neighborhood died young at least.
The point I want to make is that I have stronger bone density as a direct result of physical activity while young, and I worry about the younger generation now who won't have that.
You said you view the USA's regulatory standards as the USA views Nigeria's but the USA enforces a full ingredient list so that's kind of nonsensical. If a can of tomatoes went from the USA to EU there would likely be no issue. Even the more chemical sounding names like "Calcium Chloride" salt are commonplace in the EU, in fact I think it was developed there.
I think regulations are better in the EU but you chose a really shit example to use.
They both require ingredient lists, though. This specific case could easily happen to either the EU or USA.
The USA and EU both require a full list of ingredients, though.
The blood supplies to and through every single organ the vast majority of which are much more likely to catch and accumulate particles than the stream or vessels themselves.
If it flows out when the blood moves then it wouldn't accumulate there in the first place. I'm not sure what you're having difficulty with here.
Blood doesn't work like that, as it is constantly moving and being replaced. It is not a bucket.
No because you're making blood from nutrients with microplastics mixed in. That's how it would hypothetically accumulate there in the first place. If it were being filtered out of the blood by another organ then I could see a case for scraping/removal but if it's the blood then it's coming directly from your food and drink and will be the same ratio even after bloodletting and/or regeneration.
You responded to yourself, you know?
Before I even begin, none of this is more secure than non-paired parts because you can use a standard encryption on devices without physical pairing.
Now, you mention you are already aware of PCM, BCM, etc bypasses but you trust in the PATS. Here is how to work with those:
#4 is the Passive Anti-Theft System (PATS) transceiver electrical connector (part of 14401)
#5 is the PATS transceiver
Replacement is commonly done and the component that these are registered to is the Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC) which are commonly programed and hacked without permission from the manufacturer. Plus, most examples of PATS just disable the fuel injector, so you could bypass that in like 10min if you really wanted to. In fact, the only two parts paired in that example is the key to the PATS component because the PATS is not a paired part to the IPC, it's easily replaceable.
Seems like some people are having issues while others aren't, maybe it's just a game of IP tag.