It's been known to claim commands and documentation exist when they don't. It very commonly gets simple addition wrong.
FiniteBanjo
joined 8 months ago
Its intended use is to replace human work in exchange for lower accuracy. There is no ethical use case scenario.
WE MUST TURN MAPS, COMRADE.
What about Root Mean Square? Are we cleaning signals?
And when it doesn't it still tells you that it does, incapable of correction.
Honestly it sounds extremely generous by saying the best results can be achieved by experts with GenAI. In my opinion the best results can be achieved without it entirely.
Not really, no, all of the current models built to intended scale are selling it as a product, especially OpenAI, Microsoft, and Google. It was built with a purpose and that purpose was to potentially replace expensive human assets.
JFC they've certainly got the unethical shills out in full force today. Language Models do not and will never amount to proper human work. It's almost always a net negative everywhere it is used, final products considered.
They took $669 Million USD and they've provided content and services for 11 years, people can and should expect returns befitting those numbers. Problem is, though, the team clearly hasn't demonstrated the ability to make that sort of product.
In this case that seems to be the crux of the issue. Star Citizen players pay top dollar for mediocre ingame content.
People who take money are expected to deliver equivalent goods.
So the correct usage is to have documents incorrectly explained to you? I fail to see how that does any good.