FiniteBanjo

joined 8 months ago
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 14 points 3 months ago (6 children)

PPSSPP but its too hard to use the touchscreen controls for most titles.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

Idk about other subsidies but they're probably not getting any CHIPS Act funds with this sort of behavior.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Somebody should make a Borat Meme with AMD and Intel "Big Success!"

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today -4 points 3 months ago

Well the text does very specifically state it would trigger investigation of things that have caused harm, but yeah it's not worth the risk if the FTC decides what harm is.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Alright but if an entity, for example, teaches children about self harm for pleasure or gambling then that entity should be punishable, imo.

But another user makes a great argument that the FTC could decide anything they want is the definition of harm, which could include LGBT+ and therefor KOSA isn't worth the risks.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 months ago

Does THIS LINK work you or no?

It's a little hard to find copies of prep guides for each year since it's so niche. I had copies over a decade ago but those are probably useless now. In general its really hard to get pirated technical books, I've had some luck with Library Genesis, Z Library, Liber3, or project Gutenburg.

An alternative to look at might be doing all of the AP High School and College subjects on KhanAcademy. And practice handwritten essays if you intend to take the optionals.

TBH scoring a 30 or higher on the ACT is a lot easier than scoring high on the SATs. None of the subjects will ask you to solve multivariate differential equations or anything high level like that.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What exactly is the benchmark for triggering an investigation? Child Gambling or just cartoons which say the ungodly word "taint"?

Idk, depending on the context I might support this bill. If you need to have real quantifiable evidence of harm done to children then you should expect the authorities to come in and clean it up.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 22 points 3 months ago

Post the Flintstones image, you coward!

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 3 points 4 months ago

But But But

It's made my job so much simpler! Obviously it can't do your whole job and you should never expect it to, but for simple tasks like generating a simple script or setting up an array it BLAH BLAH BLAH, get fucked AI Techbros lmao

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah absolutely, tear that company to a million pieces, but it would practically be a shorter list of common search engines that it can't be used on. Between Google, Brave, and Bing most other search engines are just built upon those three.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

TBF thats like 7/8ths of search engines used by most consumers.

view more: ‹ prev next ›