HelixDab2

joined 2 years ago
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

You really need a critical mass to break Adobe's stranglehold. I hope that someone can, because I hate their software-as-a-service model. But for now, I have to suck it up and deal with it.

Their refusal to pay to integrate PANTONE colors has really fucked up my workflow. :(

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Nothing is going to effectively hurt their bottom line, because they own the market. There are no other viable alternatives to Adobe if you are working in the graphics profession. Everyone, and I mean everyone, in graphic design/visual communication uses Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, and Acrobat. If you do any work with designers and receive files from them, you'll need to use Adobe products in order to access the files and all the information in the files.

This is the sector I work in. There is absolutely no getting away from it, and until someone comes up with a product suite that is better right out of the gate, and is completely compatible with Adobe, no one is going to switch.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago

Beat me to this.

Advertisers tend to be strongly opposed to measuring advertising effectiveness, because if they're not effective, then they're out of a job.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Interesting. I wonder if I'm going to end up getting this or not? My guess is that I won't, but we'll see.

I have Windows 11 on my new computer, yes (and I needed Windows because some of the things I want to do require it), but I installed Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC, and it doesn't really come with much of anything out of the box. It's supposed to only get security updates, no features updates.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why not use a fiber that's not not stretchy, and also not smooth? How would using a synthetic fiber affect the sound?

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

When I go to that right now, from my desktop, I get:

"Your Session Has Been Suspended

Something about your browsing behavior or network made us think you were a bot.

What can I do to resolve this?

Try again from a different device or a different location

Ensure you have enabled JavaScript in your web browser

Remove any third party browser plugins that may be running"

This is because I run all my traffic through a VPN, and Ticketmaster isn't able to harvest information from me that it wants. It expects me to allow them full access to who I am and where I am, rather than just giving me what I'm paying for.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 49 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I absolutely fucking hate Ticketmaster's way of doing this, because they require access to your phone. And they won't let me use my normal VPN, or anything that blocks them from having location access. I would rather drive to the goddamn venues--what are about 90 minutes from my home--and buy tickets in person, than to deal with Ticketmaster or AXS "security" measures that attempt to circumvent my security.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That is... Likely not correct. Finland came very, very close to losing the Winter War; Russia pulled back because they didn't realize that the Finns were on their last legs. Yes, Russia right now couldn't walk through Finland, but at the strength they had prior to invading Ukraine? It's much, much more probable. The military of Finland is tiny compared to Russia; 292,000 (about 25k active, the rest reserve) compared to 3,159,000 (1.1M active); looking solely at active military, that's 44:1, Russian advantage.

The big thing that would stop Russia now is NATO, since all countries are pledged to help any other member country if (when) Russia invade. The US is a significant part of NATO, both in terms of raw manpower, and in terms of money spent on the military. Without NATO, Finland probably loses, as long as Russia presses their attack. With NATO, but a NATO without the US, Finland wins, but it takes years. With both NATO and the US, Finland takes Moscow in 2 months.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

What’s fucking delusional is thinking that a bunch of civilians armed with handguns and rifles could ever match a modern military should it come to violent revolution

You just have to make it expensive enough that the military doesn't want to fight, and you need to have enough of the civilian population on your side that the gov't can't control them, too. As the gov't commits atrocities against its' own people in an attempt to crush a rebellion, it ends up creating more ideological rebels.

And anyways, you'll note that the US has tended to get pretty fucked up when dealing with insurgencies and guerilla warfare where it can't leverage air superiority. How many, say, Air Force pilots do you think will start refusing orders when they find out that their last 'precision bombing' run killed 150 children in a hospital?

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cheapskate parents, actually. Most parents get their kids a BALCS carrier with level III soft inserts, some ESAPI plates, and a level III or IIIa helmet. But some parents cheap out and just get their kid a backpack and split a set of plates between kids.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree with all of this. At the same time, I think that, in most cases, people should allow their body to adapt to heat, if they are healthy enough to do so. Most people can learn to be comfortable in higher heat than they believe, although some people have medical conditions that will make them more susceptible to heat exhaustion and heat stroke. If you can get by without it, you should. If you're at risk by not using it, don't feel guilty.

(FWIW, my office only has a/c because I have a very, very large printer in here, and it tends to have head strikes and scrap prints out if there's no climate control. But since I'm not printing at the moment, the current temp in here is 82F.)

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

You are confusing actual results with people being on the right side of a conflict.

No, I'm not. The NRA is not on the right side; they're on the side of authoritarians. They're on the side of the boot that is kicking you in the face. They're on the side of the cops that will be the ones disarming people, and on the side of the christian nationalists that want to take guns from everyone but white evangelical christians. The NRA does not believe that the second amendment exists for ALL people, regardless of race, religion, age, disability, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation, and they've never even tried to really conceal that. That's why they are silent when someone like Filandro Castile is murdered by a cop.

When the NRA fixes it's own shit so that, as an organization, they truly believe that 2A rights exist for everyone, and are willing to treat the disarming of any group as a crime, then we can talk. But that's not who they are now, and it's not likely that this is who they will be at any time in the future, since they've made it nearly impossible for grassroots change to happen within the org.

view more: ‹ prev next ›