HobbitFoot

joined 2 years ago
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's fine, but someone has to pay for it.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I never said people weren't allowed, but there is this weird obsession about it on Lemmy.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Then cancel and move on.

The way that people talk about it here, a streaming service raising rates is the equivalent of a significant other dumping them.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For now. YouTube is already starting to dedicate serious resources to anti ad blocking. I'm sure other streaming services aren't that far behind.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yeah. Netflix got really lucky with streaming for as long as they did and they knew it. Cable and broadcast subsidized their content and they were able to lease it for pennies on the dollar.

Of course, people don't want to admit that the subsidy for their content is gone and they are pissed about rising costs.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 15 points 1 year ago

Just because it is illegal doesn't mean you can't do it.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 year ago

Around that time, Watson was the most public demonstration of AI.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For some elderly, they may find that they need to nap again to function. If you don't drive, you don't have a private location to sleep beyond home or a hotel. Rather than go home, they sleep on a bathroom stall.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeeeah, but my issue with that is they generated the expectation that it'd be free by using their investment money to muscle out smaller competitors.

All of YouTube's competitors were doing the same thing, use ads to subsidize free video hosting. It just happened to be that YouTube was the survivor. If there was competition, it would likely have the same business model that YouTube has. Spotify may be building a YouTube competitor based on the same model.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

But it goes back to my earlier assertion that the value of user data is generally to help with advertising.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anyway you can use data to nudge users. For example, Google can change search result orders. They can promote one company/research/ideology/party to the top and demote others.

This is advertising.

Finding out where certain people are important for law enforcement or press.

This service isn't that valuable, and extracting the value required is going to be a PR nightmare.

Stores give out free wifi to track your MAC address and see where you go in stores. They sell this data, use it to track theives, or use it for better product placement.

So A-B testing for their advertising?

view more: ‹ prev next ›