Ilovethebomb

joined 2 years ago
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I've definitely noticed this, you watch one or two videos that are from a popular genre, and all of a sudden that's half your recommendations. I've found the "not interested" option does work though.

They do have a lot of viewing history to work with though.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

I haven't seen one of those Rewind videos in years, are they still a thing?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

There is a paid version, and it's good value for money in my view.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

YouTube is basically where all the science and engineering content has moved to. How it's made, megafactories, air crash investigation, if you enjoyed that type of content, it's now on YouTube.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Or wear out the wall switch.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 53 points 4 months ago (15 children)

You could save yourself cents per year!

They don't actually say how much power a charger uses on standby, and make an unsubstantiated claim that they "wear out" due to "voltage fluctuations". Sure thing.

Absolutely pointless article.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 31 points 4 months ago (9 children)

Either to take a very long time to get to the point, or to go off on a tangent.

Writing concisely is a lost art, it seems.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 51 points 4 months ago (15 children)

Ironically, the author waffles more than most LLMs do.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You would still need to run the computer off multiple plugs, as almost any 240v plug is 10a.

You'd likely need a dedicated breaker and plug, similar to a stove plug.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (4 children)

What about the rest of the computer though?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

It was all so normal until the last sentence.

view more: ‹ prev next ›