That is what lawsuits are for. Why didn't this happen every other time a company did it?
IzzyJ
They could do what many early tech companies did and offer a seperate price for business use if that becomes an problem
I find it highly unlikely that those purchasing a steam machine aren't doing so with gaming in mind
If you're playing video games on PC, did you not read it?
Not only is it your job, you're legally required to, and your shareholders can sue you if you don't as per Ford v Dodge
Iceland made theor 4 day workweek experiment permanent...because it was actually more productive.
They don't even want all the money, they just want us to suffer
I do absolutely celebrate the contributions they've made, Proton beats the shit out of every alternative and it's not even close. Black hole vs mouse levels of curbstomp
I also think people with bad values should suffer for those values. I am an ideologue
Listen. I'm not saying these games are wholesome. But if it's not illegal in my country, I should be able to access it on principle. And frankly there's very few things it should be illegal to make media about
Overturn Ford v Dodge
If you're playing video games on PC, you fucking have steam.
Thry could absolutely do that. Valve makes a cut off every Steam game sold. If anything, it'd be MORE viable for them than any other console maker given the wider library
Have you considered maybe Valves monopoly is natural? That is convenient to have all the games in one place and their customers like what they're selling?