JackbyDev

This was your explanation.

Well im talking about external interpretation of ones identity rather than one's intended expression, so you figure it out. Or don't.

I'm good faith, I assumed the best by saying this.

I'd say that's supportive of femme leaning enbies rather than transphobic towards trans women.

Rather than agree with me, you said this and refused to elaborate, going so far as to tell me to interpret as I like. When I only have two possible interpretations, one positive and one negative, I don't know what else you'd want me take away other than the negative.

There are other things it could be. Interperet as you like.

So I clarified, in good faith, it you meant the negative thing.

Wait, so you are being transphobic?

You were vague and refused to give any explanation. I thought it might be two things. When I asked if it was one of them, your response seems to heavily imply it wasn't that one, but refuse to give whatever third thing it might be.

That was one of the things you proposed. Im suggesting there are other potential meanings, that you did not propose. i will not be explaining what i do mean any farther than i have

So... What is it? Because you're saying that I am "not making an effort to understand" when I am in fact bending over backwards to give you benefit of the doubt and understand what you mean. You say communication has two sides and you're done trying to uphold mine when I am desperately seeking clarification on what you said but you just refuse to provide it.

I'm just about done with this fucking place and im done going out of my way to explain myself to people who arent making any effort to understand. Communication has two sides, i cannot hold up yours

What have I missed?

Criminal negligence.

Well said.

I'll keep streaming and just eat less popcorn. I've been needing to cut back. I blow a kiss to the sky. I got your back, Mother Earth. I always check the resin identification codes before I recycle plastics, too.

It's so so frustrating. AI is cool, I get it, LLMs are impressive, but we're in such a bubble right now. Every company is like "damn, that other company is doing a cool thing with AI, we need to make sure our shareholders think we're doing cool things with AI too!" So they make flashy AI things and it feeds back into the cycle because obviously other companies and their shareholders see it, because these companies are publicly traded.

The devices they're talking about are also still turned on. The power usage of the network requests is incredibly small. Switching from cellular to wifi will make the biggest difference, but who the hell isn't already on their home wifi network? Plus, at least me personally, I have my liked songs downloaded on Spotify to save data usage. I suspect others may as well.

This is like the folks worrying about the water usage of AI. Environmental concerns are a real problem and there are tons of things to focus on, but they pick such a weirdly specific, negligible, non-issue.

Ads don't have audio? That's news to me.

No need to be condescending. The current laws about hacking in America are actually much more strict than they should be and can be used to punish people who actually do just stumble on things they shouldn't have access to as well as people who are ethical whistle blowers. So no, it seems you don't "how laws work."

But I don't believe those laws should be used to go after people who make mistakes or report problems in good faith. These folks didn't make an innocent mistake and weren't acting in good faith.

Relevant username! /s 💜

Same in America. Someone who found a government website had SSNs just sitting in the HTML was almost prosecuted for viewing the raw HTML after ethically disclosing it.

Sorry, I don't tip.

I don't think it's necessarily part of a larger trend, but it could be. I think it's just in reaction to some of the specific posts being shared.