I totally agree, but nobody is saying everyone that uses a computer is a tech wiz. I'm saying there are still plenty of people today interested in digging in deeper just like there were back then. Tech being more accessible today hasn't led to a decrease in such things, because the people the ease brought in wouldn't have dug in in the past.
JackbyDev
joined 2 years ago
Not everyone sees everything. It feels like gate keeping to assume everyone has to have seen everything based on their join date.
I think you're missing my point. I'm not saying everyone capable of using a computer today is equivalent to that level of dedication and curiosity. I'm just saying that in the same way only a handful of people do that today only a handful of people pursued it in the past. It's become easier to use computers, but hat doesn't mean there still aren't people who learn the ins and outs of them today like people had to do in the past to use them.
You can actively want to do something but be bombarded with minute ultimately irrelevant details and still get frustrated.
I'm really confused by your reasoning here. You're describing how it was extremely difficult to you and you had to go to great lengths to learn technology. Not everyone did this back then not does everyone do it now.
and they from teens geeking around with computers, and oops - teens are not geeking around with computers, they are watching reels and scrolling recommendations and doing other bullshit.
"Youth bad." Lazy take. As if everyone in the gray beard generation was tinkering around with computers? Plenty of youths still tinker. Posting condescending shit like this is just going to turn them off from pursuing/contributing.
It's not that it's "too hard", it's that even a tiny set back for something that someone is already hesitant to do can be enough to make them not do it. It's just easier to call that "hard" or "confusing" than say "even a tiny set back for something that someone is already hesitant to do can be enough to make them not do it."
You have to think of it from a micro blogging perspective. Imagine I have a ton of followers and have created a culture of them attacking anyone I attack. It makes more sense how it is bullying in that context.
Edit: Also, to be clear, I'm not arguing against this feature, just explaining how it can be used for bullying.
(This is an example.)
Get a load of this idiot! They can't imagine how quoting someone can be bullying!
But plenty of people still do learn the deeper stuff. Just because you can write a game without code doesn't mean everyone who makes games is doing it without code. Arguing otherwise just feels like bemoaning some sort of lost golden days when that's not the case. It's because everyone who used to be into these hobbies knew the ins and outs. Now more people are into it so proportionally less know the ins and outs, but I see no reason to believe the absolute number of people who really want to learn the deeper stuff has gone down.