JackbyDev

joined 2 years ago
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago (4 children)

~11 months ago they relicensed from GPL 3 to CC BY-NC-ND.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago

It's not an open source license. Even CC warns against it because it isn't a free media license.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Make a fork that supports Linux as satire since the whole situation is so crazy.

Edit: The joke being you could argue it's fair use.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago

At one place I worked we couldn't use eclipse licensed things because the license mentioned indemnification or something. I don't really understand what that meant because I think some other licenses mentioned it too. Plus literally all of us used Eclipse IDE.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Good faith discussion.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Where? And don't tell me to look up or read again because I recounted the conversation as I understood it already and went over with you that you're not being clear, so if you're acting in good faith tell me where?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I did and I'm asking for clarification.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

This was your explanation.

Well im talking about external interpretation of ones identity rather than one's intended expression, so you figure it out. Or don't.

I'm good faith, I assumed the best by saying this.

I'd say that's supportive of femme leaning enbies rather than transphobic towards trans women.

Rather than agree with me, you said this and refused to elaborate, going so far as to tell me to interpret as I like. When I only have two possible interpretations, one positive and one negative, I don't know what else you'd want me take away other than the negative.

There are other things it could be. Interperet as you like.

So I clarified, in good faith, it you meant the negative thing.

Wait, so you are being transphobic?

You were vague and refused to give any explanation. I thought it might be two things. When I asked if it was one of them, your response seems to heavily imply it wasn't that one, but refuse to give whatever third thing it might be.

That was one of the things you proposed. Im suggesting there are other potential meanings, that you did not propose. i will not be explaining what i do mean any farther than i have

So... What is it? Because you're saying that I am "not making an effort to understand" when I am in fact bending over backwards to give you benefit of the doubt and understand what you mean. You say communication has two sides and you're done trying to uphold mine when I am desperately seeking clarification on what you said but you just refuse to provide it.

I'm just about done with this fucking place and im done going out of my way to explain myself to people who arent making any effort to understand. Communication has two sides, i cannot hold up yours

What have I missed?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago

Criminal negligence.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago

I'll keep streaming and just eat less popcorn. I've been needing to cut back. I blow a kiss to the sky. I got your back, Mother Earth. I always check the resin identification codes before I recycle plastics, too.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago

It's so so frustrating. AI is cool, I get it, LLMs are impressive, but we're in such a bubble right now. Every company is like "damn, that other company is doing a cool thing with AI, we need to make sure our shareholders think we're doing cool things with AI too!" So they make flashy AI things and it feeds back into the cycle because obviously other companies and their shareholders see it, because these companies are publicly traded.

view more: ‹ prev next ›