JaymesRS

joined 1 year ago
[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 1 points 10 months ago

I forgot that police have no filters or power in person to be more private in discussions about sensitive topics just because there’s a person at their precinct. All conversations happen wide open just like you get with a police-band scanner. 🤦🏻‍♂️

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 1 points 10 months ago

Nope, even never had any sort of analogous situation where armed civilians show up to insert themselves and potentially complicate matters: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2018/07/13/feature/in-all-reality-there-were-three-shooters-oklahomans-kill-an-active-shooter-and-its-not-as-simple-as-it-sounds/

do we need to encrypt ALL chatter…

I never suggested we did. The original poster referenced a specific context of a “sensitive situation” and you asked for an example, so I provided one that could qualify.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My wife is a physician and I’ve talked with her about this with regards to healthcare in general. Most people still think of healthcare like a visiting a wizard for a potion or somatic incantation.

So throw 2 black box-type problems at each other and I have no doubt that a lot of people would be surprised that the results are crap.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

You must know that unencrypted police radios have been a upstream source for local media for a long time, right?

And I’m not arguing that encryption is a good idea, in fact I think a blanket encryption of emergency radio is a bad idea (but nuance on social media is invisible).

This thread is simply in answer to an earlier poster who asked for a situation where it could be helpful to protect a sensitive situation and I provided one that we have seen analogs of in real life.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

We had a kid cross state lines to show up to a riot with a gun to defend property and shoot people. Just because you haven’t heard about it doesn’t mean it’s not plausible as a valid reason.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe -1 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Off of the top of my head, I can see how an announcement of an open shooter at a location might attract some Meal Team 6 Rambo wanna-be to try and bust in and save the day and making it significantly worse.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 5 points 11 months ago

Oratrice Mecanique d'Analyse Cardinale

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Is it going to last more than 4 hours?

view more: ‹ prev next ›