Jesus_666

Can confirm. I met both of my girlfriends (sequential, not parallel) at meetups for a certain online community. And I wasn't even looking; it happened organically.

Turns out that if you go where people are basically guaranteed to share at least some of your interests, it becomes much easier to find someone you gel with.

Protip: Don't go looking to find a partner, try to make friends. If one of those friends ends up dating you, so much the better. If none do, you still made friends and that goes a long way already.

A fair point, although I wasn't aware of much of it when I bought the game. I still play it because, well, the money's already spent.

That's what I use but save syncing is still in beta and the absence of the (admittedly minor) Galaxy-exclusive stuff in CP2077 kinda irks me.

It's pretty minor (stuff like a t-shirt with the Galaxy logo on it) but it's kind of annoying that it's locked.

They could try to offer a proper Linux Galaxy client, though. Especially since CP2077 locks some minor things behind being launched from Galaxy.

GUI disk space analyzers are absolutely amazing.

For those who prefer KDE and/or donut graphs, Filelight has you covered.

Call the Ghostbusters, duh. They ain't afraid of no ghost.

The Marathon AIs weren't all bad.

Leela meant well but was completely outclassed.

Durandal had been rampant since before the first game and only reached some degree of stability once he stole that Pfhor ship. He was basically designed to be unstable. While he was certainly an asshole with rather loose morals, he also made sure that Leela could warm humanity about the Pfhor and that his S'pht allies got what they wanted. He's on the verge of being an antihero.

Tycho... Well, we only saw him after the Pfhor rebuilt him and that version of him is pretty clearly a villain.

Thoth was barely conscious until he merged with Durandal. I can't say much about him. He is possibly involved with altering the timeline after the W'rkncacnter was released so I'd book him as a good guy.

(I am mad at the new Marathon but for different reasons than the AIs.)

I think major factors in people bitching about the Windows 10 EOL is that a) Windows 10 was explicitly marketed as the final version of Windows and b) Windows 11 is so unappealing that even companies are reluctant to upgrade.

Normally, that wouldn't be a big problem. We had dud releases before. Windows Vista had few friends due to compatibility issues but was workable. Besides, 7 was launched shortly after Vista's EOL. Likewise, Windows 8's absurd UI choices made it deeply unpopular but it was quickly followed by 8.1, which fixed that. And Windows 10 again followed shortly after 8's EOL (and well before 8.1's).

Windows 11, however, combines a hard to justify spec hike with a complete absence of appealing new features. The notable new features that are there are raising concerns about data safety. In certain industries (e.g. medical, legal, and finance), Recall/Copilot Vision is seen as dangerous as it might access protected information and is not under the same control that the company has over its document stores. That increases the vector for a data breach that could lead to severe legal and reputational penalties.

Microsoft failed to satisfyingly address these concerns. And there's not even hope of a new version of Windows releasing a few months after 10's EOL; Windows 12 hasn't even been announced yet.

It's no wonder that companies are now complaining about Windows 10's support window being too short.

Yeah, and in the 70s they estimated they'd need about twice that to make significant progress in a reasonable timeframe. Fusion research is underfunded – especially when you look at how the USA dump money into places like the NIF, which research inertial confinement fusion.

Inertial confinement fusion is great for developing better thermonuclear weapons but an unlikely candidate for practical power generation. So from that one billion bucks a year, a significant amount is pissed away on weapons research instead of power generation candidates like tokamaks and stellarators.

I'm glad that China is funding fusion research, especially since they're in a consortium with many Western nations. When they make progress, so do we (and vice versa).

At least the fusion guys are making actual progress and can point to being wildly underfunded – and they predicted this pace of development with respect to funding back in the late 70s.

Meanwhile, the AI guys have all the funding in the world, keep telling about how everything will change in the next few months, actually trigger layoffs with that rhetoric, and deliver very little.

I fully agree. LLMs create situations that our laws aren't prepared for and we can't reasonably get them into a compliant state on account of how the technology works. We can't guarantee that an LLM won't lose coherence to the point of ignoring its rules as the context grows longer. The technology inherently can't make that kind of guarantee.

We can try to add patches like a rules-based system that scans chats and flags them for manual review if certain terms show up but whether those patches suffice will have to be seen.

Of course most of the tech industry will instead clamor for an exception because "AI" (read: LLMs and image generation) is far too important to let petty rules hold back progress. Why, if we try to enforce those rules, China will inevitably develop Star Trek-level technology within five years and life as we know it will be doomed. Doomed I say! Or something.