What? Ya can't have access at all that; at what situation can ya fathomly have a want to access that?
If you ever do need it, just hit the ol' fn+super+shift+q,z
If you ever need a 'z', just hit fn+alt+Ctrl+backspace.
Ezpz
What? Ya can't have access at all that; at what situation can ya fathomly have a want to access that?
If you ever do need it, just hit the ol' fn+super+shift+q,z
If you ever need a 'z', just hit fn+alt+Ctrl+backspace.
Ezpz
"Why can't men understand hints?"
Science is influenced by academia. Still an important distinction.
Leaving the musky fields for where the sky is truly bluer.
I think the reason for this implementation is more the theft prevention. This sounds very mich like certificates to me
I'm with you on that.
For the individual saving is something very good. For the economy, however, a money hoarder is dead weight. It's why inflation won't ever completely go away, because it discourages hoarding (investing/bringing it to the bank can counteract this, that's why I didn't call it saving the second and third time)
It really depends who the issuer of the certificates (wallets) is. The funds get automatically transferred and won't be lost, it's "just" a privacy problem (plus the issuer will probably be able to interfere).
So the idea isn't that dystopian, but it very much depends on the implementation.
I think the idea was that you can't hoard anything, and stealing or reusing is harder. But it does make the central management way more powerful than it should be. But it's normal bank standard.
What do you mean with "dystopian statist money"?
Yeah, I think so too. It should replace bank transactions completely.
The netherlands are already looking into it: https://www.ngi.eu/ngi-projects/ngi-taler/
The project could be used via paper trail, as far as I understand it.
Okay, yeah, I'm wrong here. I thought the statement that the name calling lasted for a year meant that the ignored assignment was left unpunished. Don't really know why I thought that, now that I read it again.
What can anyone alternately make about usage?