I have an even better idea: make tool creators and / or CEO of the company, using the tool, liable for all tool's mistakes and hallucinations.
Llewellyn
joined 1 year ago
Which has the same concept as the LLM under the hood, hasn't it?
encrypted is the key word
Partially agree: money by itself do not maintain Linux. You need a man - willing and competent one.
We'll see, whether empty positions would be filled or not.
I imagine the sanctions preventing them from working on Linux is the least of their problems
It's even more problematic for users of Linux. Less maintainers.
for personal needs
Not effective enough, it seems.
Seems like a rather harmless fetish
C-suites also are someone's husbands, wives, sons and daughters.
It's early morning, and Zelda Montes walks briskly through the crisp New York air as they head to Google's headquarters on Manhattan’s 9th Avenue.
Oh my god, why put in a topic about serious matter all that fancy decorum? I immediately see a man with a bun, typing this topic in a café, not caring a single shit about real people behind the text.
In theory. And not necessarily soon. Don't forget the context of this thread: we compare bitwarden with keepass, which does not offer to you your password base on their server side.