LordKitsuna

joined 1 year ago
[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, im a sysadmin that regularly hosts open source alternatives

I've got quite a few

https://short.kitsuna.net - url shortner

https://paste.kitsuna.net - pastebin

https://piped.kitsuna.net - yt front

https://pixiv.kitsuna.net - pixiv front

https://imgur.kitsuna.net - imgur proxy

https://search.kitsuna.net - whoogle

I used to have a matrix home server but ended up just using an existing one in the long run. I would actually love an alternative to Twitter, mastodon just never really took off. This looks really good but i legitimately have nothing but problems with bluesky app. It's performance is horrendous and I've watched it be horrendous on other people's phones so it's not just mine.

To be a little bit more specific I can easily trigger the behavior by let's say browsing a specific art tag and then attempting to favorite multiple posts in a row. After I favorite one or two it'll suddenly lock up stop accepting input other than letting me continue to scroll and I have to wait until it processes whatever it's processing and then all the inputs suddenly catch up at once

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is this why the app is worthless trash? I just tried it and while scrolling through artists and trying to like posts to prime the algorithm the whole app will just stop responding. I can scroll but none of the buttons work. Can't favorite, go back to home, anything until it suddenly does all the taps backlog at once.

Makes sense as it's react native trash. I fucking hate that name. There is nothing native about react native it's just web code garbage

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Yes they have a canary entry on their transparency reports.

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Business, the core of their business model over any other CDN is that steadfast privacy that they will only give information when it's mandated by a court order

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Looked it up some, In ideal conditions, and with supervision. The pilot can't just take a nap and forget about it. Which, two Tesla's credit when you activate the feature for the first time it does make you read a large unskippable warning that you need to be paying attention at all times. I still don't mind the name autopilot I just hate that they are marketing it as fully autonomous self-driving because that's the part that implies you don't need to be watching over it (to me)

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Real Autopilot also needs constant attention, the term comes from aviation and it's not fully autonomous. It maintains heading, altitude, and can do minor course correction.

It's the "full self driving" wording they use that needs shit on.

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Inb4 it actually stopped with hazards like I've seen in other videos. Fuck elon and fuck teslas marketing of self driving but I've seen people reach far for karma hate posts on tesla sooooooo ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago

The best citation I can give you at the moment is to have you ask your local Post office. I have before with mine and you can find many anecdotes of other people talking to their own post office and the answer you will generally get from the post office is that they deliver to an address and the owner of that address has the right to receive mail so when mailing to a business the business has the right to receive that mail even if it is somebody else's name on the mail.

Technically it does violate a couple common laws depending on the situation. You can find an explanation at https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/tools/hr-answers/can-employers-open-employee-mail-sent-to-office

Use reading mode in Firefox to bypass the paywall

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It will never cease to amaze me how people don't understand the law. No opening that mail was not a federal crime, if it's addressed to the business building than it is considered property of the business even if it has a specific person's name on it. They are fully within their right to open the letter, is it a dick move and are they assholes? Yes, is it a federal crime? Absolutely not

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Except it can would and does. Lots of instances with overzealous owners/moderators that defederate or remove anything they don't like

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I've never really understood that argument. Most VPN software I've seen forces your DNS through the VPN as well which would bypass a public Wi-Fi's attempt to DNS poison.

I use a VPN anytime I'm not on my home network just because it's a super easy way for me to force my DNS to my own custom DNS with Adblock listing on the machine that's running the VPN endpoint.

It's wireguard, and it connects to a direct IP address. If someone tries to redirect or otherwise man in the middle of the connection wireguard will simply fail to establish a connection. Thanks to the fact that it uses a similar idea to pgp where the client and server already have each other's public keys and there's not really an unencrypted initial handshake even the initial talking has a form of encrypted communication thanks to the key pairings.

So like, my vpn is definitely proving security. Whether or not every random ass VPN you can buy is smart enough to force all DNS over the VPN or anything else I guess I can't say for sure maybe it's not common and that's why but it definitely can be used to help automate some security measures when using a public network

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I fell asleep, I woke up with a popsicle stick in my mouth, fired again. Missed

view more: next ›