Does it even have push to mute with a keybind? It feels like their voice/video chat is super feature bare lol
MangoPenguin
Not great. It's missing discord features like screen sharing and voice rooms (only sort of has them through a third party app, Jitsi, but that experience is... not great).
It also has moderation issues, lacking tools needed to keep spam out and easily control it when it does get in.
I recently deleted my account because there was a spam wave sending out room invites to anti-trans named rooms, and there's no way to mass ignore, you have to click on every invite, click 'ignore' and wait like 15-30 seconds for the server to process.
Related to the above it has performance issues, a lot of UI actions wait for the server to respond, so just have a long delay to them making the user experience feel really crummy.
There are also a bunch of different client apps all with their own features, one will support X but not support Y and the other way around for another app, and there's no guide on what app to use so that's confusing.
Overall it feels like alpha or very early beta software, it works if you're willing to deal with a lot of headache.
Just gave it a try, lovely simple interface!
Is it possible to show the container names or compose projects using an image? For example I have ferretdb showing a major update from 1 > 2, but I don't know where that image is used so I can check or update the compose file deploying it.
Not really its job, it just shows you updates are available. No docker update manager checks for maliciously modified images.
Yeah WebDAV is significantly better for our use cases, S3 has so many weird limitations and it's hard to find clients for it.
Check what the last wake source was and see of that helps.
My HP laptop did that until I disabled "Deep Sleep" in the BIOS settings, now it sleeps properly and only loses a couple percent per day.
Mostly because it's such a pain in the ass to get in to and be on private trackers if you're not a serious user.
I'd say it's better to use public trackers vs private, better access for people that way.
If you're on a dynamic IP from your ISP then it may change, leading to that site showing data from other users.
If your ISP uses CGNAT then that site will show data from tons of users at once since they are all on the same IP.
Because manufacturers are scummy, that's why.
Oh wow, the router allows Admin and SSH on the WAN port? That seems like a massive problem to start with.
WAN should allow nothing except established.