Agreed, but let's not pretend r/fuckthes has a point in it being dumb and unnecessary.
Using it removes even the slightest room for misinterpretation. That is always a good thing.
MentalEdge
joined 1 year ago
It was very obvious.
But text can't have a tone of voice or display body language, it's use is to distinguish ourselves from the people who actually say and believe the insane stuff.
Even worse, is when some nutcase says something like this, and then gets upvotes and validation. Not realising that a bunch of people assumed it was sarcasm.
It serves a purpose tho, in that as text can't have a tone of voice or display body language, you do need to distinguish yourself from the people who actually say and believe the insane stuff.
Without it, there will be a fraction of people who misinterpret what you meant. It's not about "fearing downvotes".
Fair enough. And I'm absolutely far more interested in convincing people to just not jump to "patent troll" with this little to go on.
And preferably not spreading misinfo like "nokia is just a microsoft puppet" when this is about the part of the company that MS never even acquired.
I'll be ready to flip the second it comes out if this suit is BS.
But I'm initially siding with Nokia Oyj here because they have a decent track record of actually doing the legwork on their tech, advancing the science, and sharing that with the industry through sane licensing.
Also the company is one of the success stories of my country, so maybe I'm biased, but then that hasn't stopped me from hating exploitative pieces of shit like Rovio and Supercell.
And inaccurate. MS never bought Nokia in its entirety, the parts it did acquire languished for a while, with the brand eventually ending up with HMD Global. That is the company that makes Nokia phones today, and they're doing ok.
The company that's relevant in this patent dispute is Nokia Oyj, the main operations of which is telecom RnD and infrastructure, and it has nothing to do with MS aside from being the company that they bought a mobile phone division from.
That's not even close to the full story, and partly straight up incorrect.
They sold their mobile branch. The brand of which eventually ended up with HMD global, which now makes Nokia branded phones.
Nokia Oyj is a telecom RnD and infrastructure company, as in the hardware and standards behind wireless communication tech. They never stopped.
They essentially pulled an IBM and exited the consumer market, but they never ceased operation, or sold off their main business.
Microsoft has had absolutely nothing to do with Nokia Oyj since buying their consumer handset branch off them.
Why are we mad about an active tech company protecting their IP?
Patent trolls buy up more patents than any company could ever be able to use in actual products in order to make money sueing everyone under the sun or striking extortionate licensing deals.
Nokia Oyj is the part of Nokia that Microsoft didn't buy, and it is a telecom company that does its own RnD to this day, and is perfectly open to doing reasonable licensing deals. How tf does this make them a patent troll, unless this is over something dumb and frivolous, which we don't know yet?
And if previous PS ports are anything to go by, that OS requirement isn't too absolute, and it'll run fine in proton.
Yeah that's not gonna stop either.
Right, but isn't that something we effectively do anyway, with tone of voice and body language?
And if someone doesn't pick up on our sarcasm in person, do we just let them go on thinking we believe something we actually don't?
No. We do go "I was being sarcastic" and then they burst out laughing and go "oh damn, you got me for a second there haha".
We announce our sarcasm in a variety of ways regardless of the setting. The point of making it unmissable online, is that if you don't, there will be fraction of people who walk away having misinterpreted what you were saying. In person we can make sure that doesn't happen, online in a public forum, not so much.
And since when is explaining a joke to someone who doesn't get it, a bad thing? Are you seriously arguing that ruining the joke (whether it is even ruined in the first place is debatable, imo) is too much to trade in for helping people understand?