Moneo

joined 1 year ago
[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In my opinion, anyone saying OW2 is worse than the original is saying this for personal reasons and not trying to be objective. OW2 is, in my experience, much more balanced than OW1. Many of the more frustrating aspects of the game have been fixed or removed, and most of the characters added since OW1 seem fun to play and not frustrating to play against.

There are very many valid criticisms one can make of Blizzard. The history of being a shitty workplace, the objectively awful decision to make OW2 a sequel, the treatment of Jeff Kaplan by execs, the monetization, and probably more. None of those criticisms (except monetization to a limited degree) have anything to do with whether or not OW2 is a bad game or not.

But I'm speculating since the person you responded to has not elaborated on any of their views.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Hockey players are another breed. Not agreeing with his decision but also not that surprised.

Also, "sets exactly a good precedent"? I don't see why this man should be expected to make personal/medical decisions based on "setting a good precedent".

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Or just fund public transportation instead :)

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

This is the most tech bro thing ever.

"Lets innovate ourselves out of a problem that innovation created"

Imagine trying to invent a new class tech instead of just putting your phone down.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I'm well aware of how it works.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

we like it thic

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Works surprisingly well even after all this time. I often forget its been removed.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Because that would just be another ad lol

view more: next ›