Moonrise2473

They're releasing a new version every two month or so and dropping them rapidly from support, pinning it with a tag means that in 12 months the install would be exploitable.

Now, I did directly to production because this is low priority stuff, but it would have happened even with a testing stage. I would have never noticed that the forms apps was disabled, the system disabled it without any notification.

You would expect that an official app supports the latest release, no?

This wasn't an app released by a nobody in their free time, this is a main feature heavily advertised in their blog. Look by yourself:

https://nextcloud.com/blog/nextcloud-forms-to-keep-your-surveys-private/

It's not unreasonable to get pissed when 6 months after that blog post it doesn't support the latest release anymore.

I wiped a whole drive (luckily it was filled with a redundant backup) with the docker image, as the behavior was (or still is, don't know if it was fixed) to rm -rf . and replace with fresh stuff if occ isn't found. So in the docker compose I accidentally mistyped the wrong volume as /mnt/disk2 instead of /mnt/disk3 and it erased it

Yes no staging because it's something used at most by 2 concurrent users, we were ok with 95% reliability (we discovered it was disabled after at least two weeks lol)

Otherwise we would just have signed up to one of the many cloud forms sites at $100/year

Backups daily but it's unthinkable to revert something like nextcloud to a months old one

Subscribed to both newsletter and RSS feed to know about issues (the command to update the docker images isn't automated but manually issued). The maintainer of the forms app is nextcloud itself so any incompatibility should have been written in red bold characters in the blog posts and newsletter.

You mean the one that used to be called tomato? (Forgot how it's called now)

It never gave me any image that was bigger than 1000 pixel in width. I could get a very similar result with the Google images thumbnail + waifu2x

I never had them working, the result that they were giving was a very low quality image. Like if they just downloaded the free thumbnail and passed it through waifu2x

If you make a backup with a tool like Borg that creates encrypted archives, then using AWS S3 glacier is the cheapest.

What's bad about it: if you ever need those files again, it's going to be VERY expensive to download them again, so it has to be treated as the "what if a nuke hits my city and all the local and off-site backups are vaporized" solution

Also: it's not recommended to directly host plain files, they need to be in an archive format with big chunks, as the API calls that are used to list them during sync are counted in a very expensive way

Ah maybe I was missing the ./ , it said garage not found on path (on mobile, can't try)

I set garage via docker and it was not impossibly hard.

Main problem is that there isn't an admin panel and you can't login to the docker container via docker exec, so you have to write some python (or other language of your choice) to send requests to the API port to:

1. Set the layout of your server
2. Create an user
3. Create a bucket
4. Assign that bucket to your user

It makes sense

In the serie A let me see what they can do with that money... Uhm the Juventus can't even pay for Dusan Vlahovic (he gets €12 million - net per season)

What if the apps are installed via adb using

pm install -i "com.android.vending" /sdcard/yourapp.apk

?

For the system then the app has been installed from the play store

Or it checks online to see if the current user has a (free?) license?

Private conversations I mean

Yes as the API is checking from where it has been installed. If the installer isn't the play store app, then the same APK installed manually, would give an error.

It is going to be an incredible hassle to install geofenced apps