A VPN either:
Logs access/usage so it can be given to authorities. (And/or sold/stolen etc)
doesn't log usage data and willingly accepts that some disgusting stuff will be done using their service.
1 might have to give browsing data if sued by a media company, 2 is ethnically bankrupt and shouldn't be trusted at all.
Doesn't mean their not useful, just be aware of who you are giving your money to and the limitations of their protection.
Ah yes, give your browsing history to the shady VPN company instead.
Although that would help in this situation.
I'm surprised they didn't blame the crash on the Decepticons!
... actually it was caused by one of the engines falling off! (or the nossle anyway)
Yeh, probably. But in this case they probably had only a few passwords per email, but lots of usernames to try. So per account blocks may not have worked as they had the correct passwords?
This is the one that was from previously breached credentials right?
So their only fault was not forcing (did they support?) 2FA. + Potentially not having brute force monitoring?
To test the concept, now they know that it works they can come up with a dedicated mission that can cover a lot more ground - the rovers are slllloooowwwwwwww.
They can license it, just like how Apple should have licensed their tech.
They already had one go at it when they tried splitting donations per channel - so most of the smaller donations would get eaten by credit card fees.
They rolled that one back when everyone cancelled their subs...
What is the likelihood that you could set up a server to bridge the two protocols?
Ideally, using just IP6 would be simpler, as every device gets a global address. Then you don't need to mess with NAT, port forwarding and all that bullshit. Every device having multiple addresses just complicates things.
What are the pros/cons of brave (what is it even)? Are they actually a search engine, or just re-skinning Bing or something like DDG does?
Even better if you use the new .zip tld as valheim mods are (probably?) Zips?