Nomecks

joined 11 months ago
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

ChatGPT confirmed to be a MAGA edgelord.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Traditional Russian values means that you're simply left to die and go unreported until the collapse of the next dictatorship.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

I did 100TB, 100 streams of 1TB, all simultaneous with rsync

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Red Hat, because it's free for developers and used by a lot of enterprises.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

If you have enough users and systems that this is a problem then you should be centrally managing it. I get that you want to inventory what you have, but I'm saying that you're probably doing it wrong right now, and your ask is solved by using a central IAM system.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It sounds like you're probably looking for some kind of SAML compliant IAM system, where credentials and access can be centrally managed. Active Directory and LDAP are examples of that.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So you would be using CoW in-memory in this case?

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Is there a benefit to doing CoW with Pandas vs. offloading it to the storage? Practically all modern storage systems support CoW snaps. The pattern I'm used to (Infra, not big data) is to leverage storage APIs to offload storage operations from client systems.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well, 1ms of latency is 300km of distance, so unless you have something really misconfigured or overloaded, or you're across the country, latency shouldn't be an issue. 10-20ms is normally the high water mark for most synchronous replication, so you can go a long way before a protocol like DNS becomes an issue.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The whole point of Asimov's three laws were to show how they could never work in reality because it would be very easy to circumvent them.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Don't worry, companies found a way to get around Moore's law: Buy more systems and build more datacenters.

view more: ‹ prev next ›