NoneOfUrBusiness

Fair enough.

I mean tbf the GOP has a supermajority in the Ohio House so there's probably not much she can do other than trolling.

So, if it wasn't them being blundering idiots, and it wasn't them deliberately doing this.......what the fuck DID happen?

An error in the simulation, probably.

The Soviets did it first.

Yes, that ceasefire.

Trump was definitely part of that ceasefire, as evidenced by how Netanyahu rejected this exact same deal when Biden proposed it last time in May. If you have a plausible reason that he suddenly changed his mind from even a month earlier (where there were no mentions at all of a ceasefire) then let's hear it, otherwise Trump is the only explanation. We all hate the orange man here but objectively speaking Trump is a lot more plausible as a explanation than Biden's lackluster "negotiations" finally bearing fruit coincidentally right before Trump's inauguration.

To Romans the English are probably the weird ones for adopting the word vomit to mean, well, vomit.

It seems it went hard in the other direction with conspiracy theories and what not, but mostly yeah.

Again, I won't argue that colonial wealth didn't contribute to the rise of Western Europe, but it was Europeans who invented the steam engine, developed thermodynamics as a science and put half a continent's worth of resources and intellect into the industrial revolution. Colonialism is only a contributing factor that came after the start of the industrial revolution. Hell, France for example barely had any colonies during the early industrial revolution and that didn't at all impede its industrialization or rise to power. If you look at, say, Ottoman history you'll see that the thing European countries had and the Ottomans didn't wasn't wealth but rather ideas.

Which is why many in the developing world feel that China's rise to prominence is the West's chickens coming home to roost.

As someone from the developing world (specifically the Middle East), we are salty about colonialism, but many of us also recognize that if we don't learn from the history of colonialism and what allowed Europe to conquer half the world (including us) we'll always be on the bottom rung of the world. There's a lot more to learn from the rise of Europe than "fuck colonialism".

I mean yes, true, but it was capitalists who made smartphones and computers. I'll just link my other reply here.

That's late stage capitalism, which only really started in the 80s. Early to middle capitalism is a mix of both panels. I'll just link my other comment here.

Honestly, not really. Colonialism made Western Europe wealthier for the time period, but it was investment in science and technology that gave the West the industrial and technological advantage that sets them aside from the rest of the world (other than China) today. There are very few non-Western non-China countries where appreciable heavy industry takes place that isn't resource extraction-parallel like oil refinement. There are also very few non-Western non-China countries with the industrial capital and technological knowhow to, for example, make smartphones.

You'll notice that I keep including China as an exception here, which is because China noticed the importance of these things and went ahead to develop/steal these, and it's because it was able to obtain these things that China is the global giant that it is today.